Client Material Information News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Anderson, investigators wanted records, communications concerning over potentialing in information about then candidate trump that the campaign would have wanted to contain ahead of the election. i remember covering that election, as you know, all too well. this was a bombshell, and the sources that we're talking to said that this warrant was not specific about what this additional information might be, but obviously, the mueller team wants to get to the bottom of all of this. and when you talk to white house sources, they're obviously not pleased about this. they see this as a continuation of...

Part of a bunch of categories in what has been described to me by several sources as a lengthy search warrant. and in terms of the "access hollywood" component, it's looking for communications that cohen may have had, i think either with the president or just on his own around that tape, as well as any other negative information that could have existed about the president, negative news stories, negative publicity around the president. so, it's a pretty broad scope, but gets very specific around "access hollywood." it's not clear what role cohen would have had about "access hollywood." that wa...

Material that's presumptively covered by the privilege. somebody reads that material and says it's covered by the privilege, and says, i won't tell the prosecutor. let's assume, hypothetically, that they go and they find privileged material between the president and his lawyer, but it's embarrassing. seriously embarrassing. do you think anybody believes that the fbi wouldn't leak that material if it's against the president of the united states? do you think that's a sufficient safeguard to protect the right of every american not to have confidential material looked at by government officials? ...

Decide they have enough evidence to engage in a very aggressive move, that the likelihood that michael cohen is going to be charged is high. >> back now with alan der ch witness, norman iseman. do you agree with that? >> i do. lawyers aren't above the law. but it's the rights of the client, that is, when you start taking the entire computer, all of the financial records, we know from reporting that it also includes conversations and -- >> how can it be done then? if you're saying a taint team isn't the way to do it, it's not right for fbi agents to be doing this, you're saying, what, a judge? ...

Occurred on monday, they're not the last raids. i know that for a fact. there are other raids that are contemplated. i anticipate them coming in the -- within the next week. >> you say you know that for a fact. the only way you would know that for a fact, i know you said you had been contacted and stormy daniels is cooperating with officials from the mueller investigation. are you saying you have learned that from people you have -- >> i'm not going to get into details as to where i've learned that, but look, i think our track record over the last five weeks relating to what i've predicted, wh...