Page 2 - Clinton Example News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Harte. every other politician that has engaged in any sort of conduct, even in this category, has had their career ended. he's had none of that treatment and some of us ignore it because we're so used to it, and some of his evangelical days made it perfectly clear, they don't care. >> i think they made a strategic choice as people often do in politics that he is delivering for them on their culture war needs on abortion, on judges, and they are fine with that. he's their champion. i will point out, though, the clinton example, how did that end? he was impeached and most of the country came to ...

Around. people like gary cohn weren't idea logical. if you look at the conversation happening now, john bolton being interviewed by the president for h.r. mcmaster's job. he's in the grand scheme of conventional orthodox generals who support the post cold war order. john bolton is an ideologue and that's what's going to happen as people are replaced. >> ideologues -- i think rick's point is right in this one respect. you usually get a new administration. cite the clinton example. you bring in with all due respect web hubbell. you bring people from home. it turns out they're a little overmatche...

>> go ahead, ken. >> i would agree with john on that concept, however, if you look at the clinton example, for instance, they negotiated parameters that were a lot different than everyone else involved in the investigation. and the reason is very simple. he is the president. and that was true for bill clinton. it's true for donald trump. and i think you're going to see some parameters certainly set and insisted upon because it is a little awkward to have to go to the court and try to cabin the president in for a situation like this. i think that gives the president's legal team some negotiatin...

To. he had a special deposition hearing just for the grand jury. so presidents can't run for the grand jurys. that's a pretty clear law. >> that's true. >> i would agree with john on that concept, however, if you look at the clinton example, for instance, they negotiated parameters that were a lot different than everyone else involved in the investigation. and the reason is very simple. he is the president. and that was true for bill clinton. it's true for donald trump. and i think you're going to see some parameters certainly set and insisted upon because it is a little awkward to have to go ...

Investigation goes. history shows the last two times you had a president under review in the nixon and clinton example, obstruction was part of what the house looked at. david, i want you to stay with us. i want to thank everyone else. a real expert panel here in the district. perfectly non-suspiciissuesuspi to talk about these issues. the president's options for north korea. what a top admiral is saying he would do if ordered to consider a nuclear strike. new demands to investigation what some are calling blurred lines between trump's presidential travel and promotion of trump inc. we h...