Bleeping lightly because what i am going to do to you is going to be bleeping disgusting. you understand me? i am going to mess your life up. for as long as you are on this freaking planet. you are going to have judgments against you, so much money, you will never know huh to get from underneath it. what i am going to do will not only destroy you it will disgust you in the way that i do it. wow. that was cut from the sopranos for being over the top. and now, please elect mr. trump to be president of the united states. right? really. here s the thing, in the course of that tirade, which is being very widely reported for all the obvious reasons, what s also getting wide coverage as part of the story is something else that mr. trump s lawyer said in the middle of all of the f bombs and the threats. he also in the same exchange told the daily beast, quote, of course, understand, that by the very definition you can t rape your spouse. it s true, he said, you cannot rape your spouse. there is very clear case law. donald trump s lawyer and surrogate for his presidential
Reporter at the center of it is she was only wrong because her sources were wrong. it wasn t her. it was supposed to be telling her true stuff but decided to tell her false stuff. i was wrong because my sources were wrong. that was judith miller. the new york time defense of the hillary clinton story this week, e-mail story, their explanation on what they got wrong here sounds similar, almost identical to the judith miller defense. they are saying we got it wrong because our very good sources had it wrong. that s according to a new york times editor. the reporters and editors on the story are not at fault. their sources were wrong. anonymous senior government officials who told the times there was a criminal referral in to hillary clinton when there was none. the times says they probably couldn t have done anything differently. not our fault, sources were wrong. what s our responsibility for that?
People to raise it from. must be nice to have that kind of roladex. but that strange bit of ted cruz viability campaign math, that s not the weirdest set of numbers. the really weird numbers about somebody who people do like as much as they don t like ted cruz. that story is next.
This was the bombshell headline, criminal inquiry sought in hillary clinton s use of e-mail. when you look ate it looks like someone is seeking a criminal inquiry in to hillary clinton action actions. after published they quietly and without notice changed the first few sentences of the story. it was an investigation in to whether information was mishandled by someone but not her. later they issued the first in what would be a string of corrections. , an earlier version of this article and earl general headline using information from senior government officials misstated the nature of the referral to the justice department regarding hillary clinton s personal e-mail account. the referral did not request an investigation in to mrs. clinton. that was the first correction. then the second correction
i will smash your face into a car windshield and then take your mother dorothy out for a nice seafood dinner and never call her again! threats like the dorothy mantooth seafood dinner threat are only supposed to be voiced by characters in movies like anchorman. they re not supposed to happen in real live major party american politics. but today they did. and it was spectacularly disgusting. and i m sorry to say that story ahead.