Page 4 - Commission Event News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

You would bifurcate the complaint and handle the one as improper governmental activities and the other parts a sunshine violation. But i just want to be sure that people have enough information to go on the sunshine complaint, but you wouldnt necessarily reveal who the underlying complainant was. You would necessarily have to reveal who the respondent was. Its an interesting point. Sorry. I wonder what the staff thinks on that . Because the staff cant initiate a complaint either on its own awareness or it can say we heard about it from x, but were going to erase x and issue a complaint . First...

Were talking about. Okay. Anyway, it could possibly go there. Somewhere in that range. I think on the chapter 2 question, i would probably not change the burden. I think the standard of proof and burden to be kind of makes sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden, if they didnt meet their burden, then you go the other way. Although it does play out in the same ...

There was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding of task force for the commission in the event that the commission doesnt overturn the tank ask force. I think the task force and the commission stand separately and i would not subject that you take the Task Force Recommendation on its own. You can choose to, but i dont think there should be a regthat provides in the absence of a Commission Decision to the contrary. I think there are really different powers and duties and i wouldnt want to complete those. I think i have said enough for the moment. Thanks. Respectfully i disagreeing ...

Agenda was for 1 30 today and some people getting got here a utility. I want to make sure im still you know, i get the agenda and get a time where i can be on time. Thats one the reason i didnt know you were going to be meeting at 11. Im on time im also here. And then in your discussions of chairman i stated to you all some time ago you are the cash cow now. Redevelopment tells you be the cash cow for all the funding thats going out and you really need to know why those funds are being given and its not being given to my opinion. I watch everything ive been walsh this city for a long time how ...

Sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden, if they didnt meet their burden, then you go the other way. Although it does play out in the same ways that we have talked about. I also would not substitute there was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding of task force for the commission in the event that the commission doesnt overturn the tank ask force....