Conjectu Conjecture News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Statements. The whistleblower got caught with chairman schiff. Remember chairman schiff, the person that the democrats instead of the House Judiciary Committee which spent a full week on this, thats not whos been in charge. The person they put in charge was the person that got caught with the whistleblower. Have you spoken directly with the whistleblower . No, we have not. Wed like to. That wasnt true. The person that said he had evidence of the first fake impeachment scam, collusion with russia, had evidence of that collusion and didnt have it. The person who in the course of that read into t...

Every president who has been impeached has been impeached for criminal acts. democrats found no evidence of criminal misconduct on the part of the president. the democrats have even failed to even prove a noncriminal standard for abuse of power and have relied on hearsay and conjectu conjecture. what the democrats are trying to do is pull the wool over the eyes of the american people and make them think that wrongdoing has occurred where there is none by using fancy rhetoric and flowery language they think they can convince a nation of their ill conceived ideas. don't fall for it, america. i y...

United states. >> what about a sitting president? >> well, any president when he's no longer president of the united states. >> a president who is in office. could robert mueller come back and say i'm seeking an indictment. >> i think that is an open discussion in terms of the law. >> so it's the justice department's opinion that a sitting president cannot be indicted. you sit on the judiciary committee. do you believe a sitting president can be indicted. >> i haven't resolved thattish you in my mind. i know it's one in controversy. i will say this with no reservation whatsoever, congress and ...

The wall street journal -- >> the answer to your question is yes. that would be based on conjectu conjecture. there's no evidence that would suggest that is what i was speaking to. i never said anything of the kind. >> the wall street journal reported last month in an e-mail that obtained on august 4th, 2016, i dined with my new pal julian assange last night. is that true? >> it's true they reported that. i've addressed this in the washington post and numerous other networks. sam nunberg was working for donald trump and working with him. when sam would work, he would call you 20 and 30 times d...

And that is my reference. nowhere do i predict the e-mails would be hacked. >> you did say his time is coming. and it came, by the way. that's the part. the truth winds up being a foil for you. this is an effort to distract from the content of the wikileaks disclosures that were incredibly embarrassing to the clinton campaign. >> it is tracking who knew what and when is and encouraging legal activities. >> there is no evidence whatsoever that i had advanced knowledge of the source. >> you called him on it two days before. >> speculation, supposition, conjectu conjecture. no proof. where is the...