Page 11 - Constitution Itself News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Bounty, that person would not have standing or injury, because there is no real interest in bounty hunters and someone else's medical treatment. the problem right now is that unless someone tries to enforce it, there is nothing for the doj to stop. there something called the all writ act going back to 1879 that the doj could say that we need the courts to enforce the constitution itself, but there is some creative lawyering that i expect to come out in this filing today. >> and melanie, paint a picture for us if you will of the impact that this texas law has had on abortion access and women's ...

Por ahí no AUNQUE a estas alturas de desarrollo constitucional y autonómico pudiera parecer innecesario, habrá que seguir aclarando cosas para el buen funcionamiento de Estado de las Autonomías. La primera de todas, y hasta me da un poco de vergüenza pensar que sea necesario recordarlo, es que se trata de un proyecto común a todos, es decir, un Estado, uno sólo, que se articula sobre la base, entre otras, pero esta principal entre todas, del reconocimiento del derecho al autogobierno de las nacionalidades y regiones que lo componen. Dicho así, no parece necesario incidir e que, prec...

>> well, i think it's a very strong case because the issue in impeachment is not was a crime committed. the issue is was there an abuse of power. i mean, if you look at the history, the federalist papers, the constitution itself, what the framers were concerned about is misuse of the power of the presidency. and if you read these 300 pages, what you see is there is absolutely no doubt that the president used his power of the president, his power to hold an oval office meeting, his power to withhold $390 million in aid in return for something that did no good for the country, but was only for h...

Of power. i mean, if you look at the history, the federalist papers, the constitution itself, what the framers were concerned about is misuse of the power of the presidency, and if you read these 300 pages, what you see is there is absolutely no doubt that the president used his power of the president, his power to hold an oval office meeting, his power to withhold $390 million in aid in return for something that did no good for the country but was only for his political benefit. that is abuse of power, and i think the case is completely made by what the intelligence committee has put forward....

President. on the one hand they're saying a president can't be indicted and tried but now they're also saying he can't be impeached because we don't like the process. the constitution says the house has the sole power of impeachment, period. it doesn't say anything about witnesses or how it's supposed to work and later on it says the senate should try impeachment. if the president is the one being impeached the chief justice is the chief judge of the impeachment trial in the senate. and by the way, impeachment is for any federal official who is -- who misuses their -- abuses their power, abuse...