Page 6 - Constitution Say News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

House. even if they impeach donald trump they couldn't remove him. what does the constitution say, if anything, about what can be done if an american people is found to be in the sway of a foreign power? >> well, you're going back to -- and you have already said it, the crux of the problem which is first of all legal scholars debate what the constitution even means on this front. i have my own particular views. but i think what is centrally important to our democracy is democracy. that means it is critically important that we petition our government. it doesn't matter what party we are in. wha...

Then down the line to -- to senate confirmed officials. paul: so you think other actors are controlling in this case? >> it's per missive. conceivable that but the president had authority to appoint somebody who was acting, who was not confirmed by the senate, but that doesn't solve the constitutional question and the question is regardless whether the constitution governs. paul: what do you think? >> i think there's a real problem, the constitution say that is officers are to be officials are to be appointed by the president with the advice and an sent of the president other than inferior off...

With her during her senate confirmation for the circuit court level about what she really believes, the questions were do you believe in the bible, that is the tone a lot of people felt she was getting. >> are we still in america? it used to be we didn't want people to establish a particular religion, now it seems the senator from san francisco would say you are acceptable only if you have no religion whatsoever. of the supreme court, 5 are catholic, 3 are jews, i could argue that we ought to have an evangelical but i don't care what the religious background is. i want a constitutionalist, som...

Come of the questions are sort of, "so you really believe in the bible," that is the tone a lot of people felt like she was getting. >> i was wondering, are we still in america? it used to be that we said we didn't want a person to establish a particular religion. now it seems like people like a senator from san francisco would say, you're acceptable only if you have no religion whatsoever. that is absurd. at the supreme court, five are catholic, three are jews, and one is an episcopalian. one could argue that we ought to have an even helical. i don't care what the religious background is, i w...

Himself. that is argument one. but argument two in the alternative, if he did, he could pardon himself and so here is where it stands. the fact is that it would be legally questionable and politically untenable to the legal issue. we know that a president can presumptiveln and we saw it with ford and nixon and avoiding any indictment and the question is if you do that, what is the constitution say. it is silent as to the issue of whether the president could pardon himself and we know that it is a vast and virtually unlimited ability the president has. however, turning that to himself, i don't ...