Page 2 - Contraception Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> i've given my life to the law. i care deeply about the law. and i think that the law fare we have seen against president trump will do great damage well beyond our time in public service. >> now, republicans with zero irony are still pretending to be the party of law and order. even though they're literally the exact opposite. and their extremism is rotting their party away from the state level on up. plus, trump and maga republicans once again threaten retribution against his political rivals, vowing to unleash a biblical flood of partisan indictments to avenge trump's felony c...

We had this incredible legislation that would have simply said you have a right to contraception. which our colleagues in some double speak claim they are for but then what do they do? they double down and won't vote for it except for two of them. so i don't think you can have a clearer difference between democrats and republicans when it comes to standing up for women's rights. yes, 59 years ago, as i noted in my speech, the supreme court established for married people that you could get contraception. but the decision to extend it to single people happened just right before roe v. wade. so i...

Are today on abortion. the reason that has some vitality is because substantive due process is the legal principle from which all of these rights are derived. the previous right to abortion services and now obergefell, lawrence, griswold versus connecticut, the contraception case, the notion being that there are some rights that are so foundational that you have a right to be protected from the government interfering with those rights. clarence thomas believes that's malarkey. he thinks that there is no such thing as substantive due process. he called it an oxymoron in his concurring opinion. ...

Pursued with patience and persistence to get to where we are today on abortion. the reason that has some vitality is because substantive due process is the legal principle from which all of these rights are derived. the previous right to abortion services and now obergefell, lawrence, griswold versus connecticut, the contraception case, the notion being that there are some rights that are so foundational that you have a right to be protected from the government interfering with those rights. clarence thomas believes that's malarkey. he thinks that there is no such thing as substantive due proc...

Don't have to work for the federal government. i don't have a right to a job at cnn. but if i don't abide by its health policies at work, i can get fired and that's well within the power of this company. it's well within the power as the president as an employer. i think it's going to be popular with voters. i think the fact that republican governors and the rnc are taking a point against this is just political morons. with the affordable care act, the contraception case, who sued? the little sisters of poor. nobody loves ron desantis or greg abbott. they're hard partisans. the independents ar...