Counter Statement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

whatsoever. okay. thank you. it sound like they're bringing in the jury right now. the jury is coming in and getting situated and then we are waiting. joey, are we going to hear guilty or not guilty? are we going to hear that? >> this is a civil trial. it's assessed in terms of liability or not liable. liable or not liable. if you're liable you get to the issue of damages which are monetary. if not liable, there's nothing further to discuss. >> whether amber heard is liable or not liable. >> first johnny, are you defaming johnny depp and is johnny depp liable to amber heard. the stan...

The Delhi High Court has ruled that its Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, do not contain any provision which bars taking additional documents on record after reply or...

The Canadian Intellectual Property Office has announced that as of December 1, 2023, updates to the Practice Notices for trademark opposition proceedings and section 45 (non-use...

Because they found all three of the statements that johnny depp was alleging as defamatory to be true, to be -- that they were defamatory, essentially i think is really a finding on the credibility of amber heard, how they felt she came across on the stand. because it's essentially that they rejected what she said to be as true. remember, two of these statements are very vague. they just allege domestic abuse, which could be financial or mental or verbal, and it seemed like there was a lot of evidence even outside of amber heard's testimony that supported that there was some type of abuse, ver...

Start. the fact is the house intelligence committee never investigated the russia connection. they never went there. they didn't bring in the right witnesses. >> that's right. they looked at what russia was doing but did not look searchingly at what u.s. citizens were doing. they did not subpoena documents, did not interview witnesses. to understand wa was this mind, the swent of those people. this was not an investigation in was an effort to exonerate the white house. >> the democrats are put out their counter statement. jeremy, you have angela hmerkel in the oval office and it strikes me, we...