Stay updated with breaking news from Data Spend Analytics. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
This enlarged dataset has shown that pricing inconsistencies are not only widespread, but that there are even larger disparities out there in terms of what firms are paying
<ul> <li aria-level="1"><span>For index data, some institutions are paying over 26 times (2632%) more than peers</span></li> <li aria-level="1"><span>For ratings data, some institutions are paying almost 6 times more than peers</span></li> <li aria-level="1"><span>For ESG data products, some institutions are also paying 6 times more than peers</span></li> </ul>
<ul> <li aria-level="1"><span>For Pricing and Reference Data, some institutions can pay up to 10 times more than peers</span></li> <li aria-level="1"><span>For Index Data, some institutions are paying over 13 times (1300%) more than peers</span></li> <li aria-level="1"><span>For Ratings Data, some institutions are paying over 3 times more than peers </span></li> </ul>
<p><span>Substantive Research, the research discovery and research spend analytics provider for the buy-side, today published headline conclusions on the current state of the Market Data pricing market, based on insights generated by its new Market Data Spend Analytics service. </span></p>
The challenge that Substantive Research solves for Heads of Market Data globally, is a lack of transparency around pricing and the availability of viable market data alternatives