Davis Presiding News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

hi, everyone we start with the fireworks in washington, d.c., today. emanating from the committee set up by the housegop. it took republicans 15 votes now in the days and months that fod followed, the house gop has done nothing except projecting the rest of their colleagues and us to the grievance of lies and conspiracies that animate life over on earth 2 where they live. today a hearing by the so-called weaponization commit presumably focused on censorship on social media and a lawsuit brought by the then-republican attorney general of missouri, he has to be an attorney from missour...

Judge's ruling stands. now it's under appeal right now, and it's a secretive process but it does seem like based on some past rulings that these gentlemen will have to end up testifying and just so, just as you said in your intro, mark meadows was basically in touch with everybody who had anything to do with january 6th that's everyone in the white house. that's the rally organizers. that's the members of congress, that's the protesters in some cases. and so he would have really insider knowledge of exactly what was happening at every step dan skav voen know was essentially trump's right-hand ...

We're going turn now to this story about this special counsel's work and tim heisey has done a great job previewing it. but we want to pull through to top of this hour some of what we know now to be ahead for jack smith, new people he'll get to talk to that will build on the extraordinary body of evidence that the january 6th select committee has before gotten. donald trump's chief of staff mark meadows was anywhere and everywhere all the time when it came to every tentacle leading into and out of january 6th. making him a gold mine of information for special counsel jack smith it makes perfec...

The first amendment. the strongest case i have ever seen for ruling in favor of the plaintiff based on just what we already know and what has been admitted by the defendant. >> what is the meaning or significance legally to all that dominion is putting into the record and all that the judge has released about the motive? because you're right it is beyond dispute at this point. both fox news' own brain room, their editorial hub and dominions's 3,280 messages into fox were acknowledged by senior people at fox made it abundantly clear they knew these things were lies. but so much what we're seein...

Well known across the spectrum, the tstandard is if you are reckless or knowing falsehood that injures the reputation of something like dominion or of any other public company or public figure, then you are liable reckless or knowing falsehood is written on every page of the material in this case. and if it i were judge davis presiding over this case, i would give very serious consideration to granting summary judgment to dchl, that is to say, there is no genuine dispute about whether fox and the people who ran it knew that they were putting out lies let's move to the damages phase. he may or ...