SFGTV March 22, 2014
Expired, it come forward for new applications. [speaker not understood] it is to uphold what was previously done. We have the right to reconsider and that is just said for the public and while im respectful, it is easy to say this project is definitely better than what was proposed in 2003, and i would just say that very he simply the other one tried to be historical. I think it would be actually very bad building at that corner. The site has been vacant for many years. It is nice to see a building. I am excited about the building, but i have a couple of questions and i think they are question...
Source: archive.org