Page 32 - Declaratory Judgment News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

It's not believable. it doesn't make sense. >> do you view the money that ms. daniels received as campaign contribution regardless of who the money came from, do you view it as a campaign contribute sngs >> anderson, we don't view it one way or the other. i think individuals that are far more qualified and educated on those laws and regulation s are ultimately going to opine on that. ultimately, if they conclude that in fact it was, katie, bar the door. i don't know where that ends, but if in fact that is the conclusion, i think that president trump and the white house could certainly have sig...

To say. but doesn't she have unclean hands in this? she took the 130 grand. she made her deal. bring michael back. i can't see his head. i don't know if he's hearing what i'm saying. you only half believe me. you're like in silhouette. what are you, mickey spillane? she took the 130 grand. she made the deal. she doesn't like the deal. but that's not the way deals work right now. when they went to arbitration, the arbitration judge said, yeah, you're not supposed to talk about this deal. you can't seek legal relief. and then she filed it anyway asking for declaratory judgment which we both know...

>> i think there is good evidence there and they're doing the right thing by seeking declaratory judgment by a court and that's when one party is unclear about their rights and responsibilities and go into court to get a judge to issue an order about what they can or cannot do. so now once they're into court, the judge basically has two options. he or she can set it for an evidentiary hearing and allow that to go forward or, according to this hush agreement, it calls for a binding arbitration in the event of any dispute. the most critical question in my mind off the bat is who the judge that w...

Relationship between the two of them, in court documents, and that the documents say that this was all about the election. and that is a problem for the federal election campaign laws. >> sara sidner, a lot there. thank you very, very much. panel members alice stewart and bakari sellers are back. and joining us we got some counsel here. legal and national security analyst former fbi special agent asha rangappa. i just got a hold of this and have been poring through it. i don't know if you've had a chance to look at this right now. what strikes you? >> well, so this lawsuit is about a declarato...

I just got a hold of this and have been poring through it. i don't know if you've had a chance to look at this right now. what strikes you? >> well, so this lawsuit is about a declaratory judgment. she's not looking for money. what she wants this court to do is basically say one of two things. that this contract was never completed. it was never formed because donald trump, under his alias or as donald trump never signed it. there were three parties to the agreement. stormy daniels, donald trump, and this llc, and one of those signatures is not there. or alternatively she says if it was formed...