Page 21 - Default Judgment News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com has launched legal action to recover the millions lost.

To litigate this so to speak in the arena of public opinion by leaking the warrant, you know, to a favorite right-wing news outlet. that's akin to a default judgment in a litigation setting. there was no objection to the government's motion. the government made i thought a cogent argument for why the court should balance these competing interests in favor of a application to unseal the warrant, and particularly when the president is leaking all this stuff publicly anyway, the judge may not be watching msnbc, but he's hchb -- he's listening to the news and learning the president is putting this...

Under siege and that he looks forward to continuing the fight, the freedom of expression. >> well, first of all, elliot, right, it wasn't like he didn't have a chance to defend himself. it was default for a reason. >> he didn't defend himself literally, so they issued a default judgment against him. so much of this, the discussion around it has been about defamation, about hurting someone's reputation of and we haven't talked about intentional infliction of emotional distress, which is literally when you can see someone for hurting another person in an extreme and egregious way. this was just ...

Hogan was a privacy case, as you correctly stated, but with a speech defense. these other ones, today, they characterize this as a defamation case. when i looked at the default judgment, the default was on an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. i don't know that i would call the trend difficult or disturbing. i think what i would call it is the by-product of this technology we have, where information is traveling at speeds we never anticipated before. and being disseminated so broadly, that we haven't accounted for it in the law. so juries are taking that mantle. they're accoun...

Correctly stated, but with a speech defense. these other ones, today, they characterize this as a defamation case. when i looked at the default judgment, the default was on an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. i don't know that i would call the trend difficult or disturbing. i think what ki would call it i the by-product of this technology we have, where information is traveling at speeds we never anticipated before. and being disseminated so broadly, that we haven't accounted for it in the law. and juries have taken that and accounted for it. >> literally accounted for it. b...