Page 14 - Delay Game News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

For purposes of january 6th investigations, the subject is of such tremendous importance that he will not exert executive privilege. trump can go to court and claim he still has some rights but you can understand how ridiculous that is, even if, for instance, people like steve bannon who wasn't working in the white house could theoretically be covered by executive privilege, which bannon can't be, the notion that every former living president could exert privilege, is unworkable. biden holds the privilege and says materials can be turned over and a court will order that. the question is how su...

Who -- who wins here? in court. >> i think trump loses, ultimately. as tim said, we don't have a definitive answer on this question from the courts. but if you look at the purpose of executive privilege, it's designed to protect the institution, not an individual. and there is precedent, by the way, for a current president exercising executive privilege over a prior president, right? i'm sure tim knows 2001, george w. bush was the one who exercised executive privilege over a request for bill clinton, his predecessor's documents but clinton didn't object. but i think the real object here, erin,...

Critical to rural ohio as well as inner city cincinnati where we have kids doing homework at mcdonald's to get the wi-fi. >> that is a stunning image. you mentioned that famous bridge connecting your city and kentucky, which is so central and really delap dated state far long time. bide season working to pass bipartisan infrastructure reform. what message do you have for those republican lawmakers playing a delay game. why is this something that shouldn't be seen through a partisan prism? >> well, for one thing, both of our senators, democrat sherroud brown and republican rob portman support i...

It's been his strategy all along to prevent the facts from coming out, to prevent witnesses from testifying to refuse to produce documents and the house will have no choice, but to either litigate those issues which ultimately, i believe, will be decided against the president, perhaps ultimately by the spoishg, but th supreme court or option b as it intends to do in part to simply add those examples of obstruction to an article of impeachment centered around obstructive conduct and simply move on, but yeah. it appears that the delay game is what the white house wants to play. the letter from t...

The objective would be impeachment and beginning the process. the president's objective is clearly what his objective has been all along. that's delay. he played a game with mueller's office about will he or won't he testify. he was never going to testify, but he managed to build in a year of delay in playing the game about will he testify. now the president is having witnesses do exactly the same thing. play the delay game. this committee is going at most one witness per week on this. so the legal enforcement once the witness denied the committee what the committee wants, the legal enforcemen...