Demandf Republicans News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

That this call took place. and either he felt emboldened by that, by getting off scot-free, or having the mueller probe lifted off of his back, and then in releasing the transcript, it was almost giving pelosi and adam schiff the weapons to use against him. >> that's exactly right. the argument you've heards ove and over from the republicans, you heard it ytoday, is that t democrats have been moving towards impeachment since the day president trump took office. that's contradicted by the very fact that nancy pelosi was very clearly not going to impeach the president. >> as was adam schiff. >> ...

Republican critics and the white house. >> aandrea, he's been trashed the president himself as being a, quote unquote, never trumper, although we should point out to the viewers that there's no evidence's that he opposed trum or would consider him a never trumper. in fact he worked in the administration and was selected for theec job on the national security council. and the reason why he has been such an important witness for the democrats in this inquiry is because of his credibility, because of his career public is service, as you just pointed out. >> phil rucker, kristen welker, garrett ha...

Here that she has the skills to move forward with hert caucus, knowing where to get the votes from. it's about making the simple case to the american people and also her members, that democrats can make this case that the president unlawfully and unfairly pressured a foreign government to try to interfere in the 2020 election. that's the heart of nancy pelosi's argument. and she realized, as we can all now see, that she could make that argument and thatha this ve could go through. there are a couple of defectors in the democratic party, but the large majority of democrats are moving forward as...

Bolton next week, which would be pretty interesting. the thing about vindman and ambassador taylor in particular that makes republicans queasy is that these are people who under ordinary circumstances, would be considered just c utterly, to pardon the phrase, but unimpeachable witnesses. they are people whobl don't hav to do these jobs. they're public servants. and they are clearly very expert in their subject matter. and in the case particularly of vindman earlier this week, he just filled in the blanks and corroborated a lot of things that republicans had sort of been able to, you know, kind...

Members of the judiciary committee. and so, you know, whenever you're calling witnesses, you don't know what's going to happen. i think they actually laid out a process that allows to at least control the environment so it doesn't become a circus. >> can they control their own sort of grandstanding, charlie question of we'll seen members of escongress, on chairman nadler's own o committee, reall diminish their political effectiveness p by the way they perform, not following up on questions, just as the republicans dides during the benghazi inquiry. >> and look at what republicans are doing, i ...