Page 27 - Development Fee News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

And owned space all over the city and we have representatives here that can go into the details. They occupy space all over the city. Theres no property tax coming from it, theyd vacate those spaces and move all their operations to the do you have a list of those spaces and what were talking about in terms of property tax dollar value . I think [inaudible] has that if youd like her to go over that. I mentioned in the remarks that this year and next year well be vacating nearly 2,000 square feet of lease space in San Francisco and consolidating those and relocating those activities to our own s...

To speak to some of the ben efits. Sgh thank thank you very much. Anybody else want to keep talking on this project. Any comments right now or should we go to many mr. Roses report. I think the department has clearly brought out the question that we have raised in our report. On page 9 in our table we show that the estimated pilot over 30 years is 39. 8 million. The payments that you see would make the one time payments total 32. 1 million so there is a gap of 7. 7 million, so we state on page where is that 32. 9 million going if we dont do this . It would go to the former ocii, the [inaudible...

Is currently not generating property tax revenue for the city. As a result of our vacating those properties, were estimating that there will be a net present value of 12. 7 million of new property tax revenue flowing to the city that would not otherwise be going to specifically to mission bay, but be going to the general fund i just wanted to speak to some of the ben efits. Sgh thank thank you very much. Anybody else want to keep talking on this project. Any comments right now or should we go to many mr. Roses report. I think the department has clearly brought out the question that we have rai...

On top of that parks et cetera, the proposed project, ucs proposed project to 500,000 square feet is fully studded ied and within the scope of there are no new transportation impacts that are associated with the development of this particular project. When we talk about infrastructure, i think its the tee line itself, that entire leg and stretch patent wires, rerouting across the bridge there, across the creek, all of that was paid for. There was a agreement that the master developer er built and developed. I understand that. Im just you know, ucsf is not obligated under state law to pay taxes...

Avoid agency couldnt shish you your project [speaker not understood] within an overall budget proposal. The other thing is on my letter that i submitted yesterday, there are a number of cases there on page 4 of the discussion of why the board has the discretion to treat this as a limited appeal, object to decision on sunday meter parking. The last point i would make is my colleague has mentioned that free muni for youth is an Important Initiative that they support and i believe theres a number of ways to avoid having to go through the same process that is here under ceqa, that their data grid ...