Page 2 - Discovery Rule News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Pre-settlement funding is when a finance business provides cash upfront in exchange for the right to get a piece of your future settlement.

Texas Supreme Court in Berry v. Berry addresses trust and estate when a claim accrues, when the the statute of limitations begins to run, constructive notice,the Court held that the plaintiff had sufficient concerns that he should have monitored the public records, Court discussed that the plaintiff was a beneficiary

Called the discovery rule repressed the memory of something and the memory doesn't come back to you until after the statute of limitations has run and demonstrate this scientifically through expert testimony. the court will begin of the statute of limitations from the time your memory comes back stated differently there are circumstances under which and the cosby case someone of them where people can sue for civil damages, for money damages now, not for criminal prosecution but for money damages well beyond the two-year statute of limitations. >> julie: basically bill cosby is responsible for ...

Least from his twitter account. >> mel, if you're his lawyer, it's a right move? >> shut up is what i would say. you're not talking to anyone about anything. there's a pending civil suit. under california law there's a teeny loophole that allows somebody to bring a claim civilly so they have what they call the delayed discovery rule which basically means that if you were sexually abused as a minor and you only way later discover the fact that the psychological injuries that you have as an adult link back to what happened to you as a kid, you can bring a civil lawsuit which is what one of the v...

Strong one, just like we saw in the 2005 case where there were 13 jane does that were named as potential witnesses. i'm certain that you're going to see a long list of potential witnesses probably by name this time, not by jane doe, that will join in to testify in the lawsuit, john. >> i want to give you a two-part question, mel, because i want you to put your legal hat on and then maybe a bit more of your pr hat if you will, since you're here with us. what would you advise him legally to do going forward? and just from a pr angle, i'm curious how you think this has been handled by his people....