>> she said she talked to her father and her father said what she said to incriminate the other guy. clearly he was right but there was an argument, what the defendant did was take this victim away from the group they were in for a reason that his watch was not working, dive watch was not working and the manufacturing company would have contradicted that and the argument the prosecution made was he was trying to get the victim away from the group and here's the clincher. he said i wasn't a rescue diver and the truth is he was certified in four areas, open water, advanced rescue, and he said i ...