Stay updated with breaking news from Dod Investigation. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The letter reiterates concerns from lawmakers that were expressed during a recent subcommittee hearing in which senators lamented a lack of cooperation from the DOD.
At a rally in Middle Georgia last Saturday, former President Donald Trump introduced Lance Cpl. Hunter Clark, who claimed he pulled a baby over a wall at the airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, an act captured in a viral video. The Marine Corps says that is inaccurate, and Clark is under investigation for attending the rally.
Three people, in texas that number is 11.7, in louisiana, it's 20. these numbers does matter. we were talking about the u.s. air force and their failure to put this information in the database. in texas you can buy guns with no background check. there are loopholes that includes department of defense but it also includes just our laws and who is required to get a background check and when. we need to fix the background check systems in a lot of different ways. >> you brought up the air force, now there's a dod investigation. that's the other argument you hear, from advocates who don't want any...
>> if they had a recommendation to make, they would make it to the army specifically and then it would be up to the army to take action on that. the existence of this dod investigation, we djts know than before, that's what seems to be new here. one quick note, kristen, on the 2014 warning about his requirement from the defense intelligence agency on what kind of proetd kols he had to establish. in some ways this seems to be pretty standard. a reminder to parting generals that they need to follow and abide by them. so whether you call that a warning or a reminder, i think that's one thing we'r...
>> absolutely. >> but his lawyer's statement was peculiar to me. the department was fully aware of the trip, the department meaning the defense department. well, that's not the issue. it wasn't that he was aware of it. the question was did they give him permission to get paid. >> exactly. >> it's what wasn't there that surprised me. maybe sloppy writing. i don't know. >> you heard the omissions. those are deliberate omissions obviously. i heard the same thing you heard. they didn't address those points and there's got to be a reason why it depidn't address those points. >> what happens next? >...