Page 2 - Doesnt Make Up News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Of wide explanation it is basically whatever the house and the senate decide it is and it talks about abuse of power. it doesn't necessarily have to be something that violates u.s. code 213. it can be whatever the political representatives of the country and the congress decide is acceptable or unacceptable. i think that incidentally could end up being the republican fallback plan and you heard some of that from bill bennett. all right, you'll have all this testimony. my guess is it will be damaging to the president and people here were saying is it not proper? is it bad enough you want to ove...

Process control the information are the ones that feed us the public bits and sound bites that we can rely on or not. i don't think what you get when you are only looking at sound bites is the whole context of testimony. you don't get cross examination. you don't get credibility assessment and so it's hard to make those determinations. no witness has been explosive outside of thoefs that the democrats have labeled as explosive. >> julie: we appreciate your time this morning. thank you very much. >> bill: there will be a flurry of legal analysis throughout the morning here as we mentioned if yo...

Violated the constitution. this is about protecting our national security and safeguarding our elections. that's why the intelligence committee has been gathering evidence and hearing testimony like any investigation, reasonable confidentiality has been paramount. witnesses should not be able to coordinate testimony in advance. the truth must be allowed to prevail. republicans have been a part of every single proceeding conducted so far. republicans conducting these depositions along with their staffs have had an opportunity to question each and every witness. now madam speaker we're entering ...

Facts for themselves. this resolution insures transparency advancing public disclosure of deposition transcripts and outlining the procedure of the transfer of evidence to the judiciary committee to use in its proceedings and enables effective public hearings setting out procedures for the questioning of witnesses and continuing the precedent of giving the minority the same rights and questioning witnesses as the majority. which has been true at every step of this inquiry despite what you might hear from there. it provides the president and his counsel opportunities to participate including pr...

Human rights. that's a condition. i haven't seen a clear-cut crime at this point. as jessica mentioned earlier if it's a bigger issue and they can say it's conduct unbecoming or shouldn't be doing it. that's a different issue. i haven't seen evidence of an actual crime as if one of us were charged with a crime. >> julie: originally the president maintained he withheld aid because of corruption. he wanted the corruption issues in ukraine to be cleared up before he gave that money. we're hearing from testimony that perhaps it was because biden was not under investigation by ukraine. but what do ...