Page 5 - Doesnt Prevent News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> it would seem to me to be quite reasonable if it's going to take two months to get it fully functional to say october 1st to december 1st. you are asking for a certification six months and beyond; is that right? >> i think that's -- i suspect the democrats think that's not unfair. >> well, but first of all the reason why it has to be six months. web site next day it shutsz down. consistently operating people are not prevented pry from showing up on exchanges. they can sign up for it now. this doesn't prevent anyone from accessing the web site. the only thing it says this can't get insurance...

Like this in place. >> exactly. what we've seen from the conservatives is the idea that it's been long enough and black turnout has gone high enough, which was mentioned in oral arguments that we don't need this any more. that is just as a logical point, a weird argument, right? if you use your seat belt every day and that keeps you safe, that doesn't necessarily mean that you should stop using your seat belt after a certain amount of time. and so these programs particularly section 5 of the voting rights act, doesn't prevent anyone from getting their rights, it doesn't have a cost on the othe...

Other things reiterating that his 2010 health insurance entitlement program that he calls obamacare, that that doesn't prevent doctors from saying that -- from releasing somebody's mental health condition to prevent them from getting a gun. well, that doesn't do anything. that doesn't mean anything. that's reiterating. so a lot of this was puff and fluff that he wanted to saying i'm doing these things, but he made it very clear, very, very clear what he means to do is turn the pressure up on congress, starting with his own party, i'm sure, to pass a gun ban of some kind. >> megyn: and we heard...

Unprofessional conduct to me. >> and he also said it was pusilanimous. your response. >> well, what he calls pussilanimous i would just call prudent. we handled this material with extreme care. we wanted to be careful not to put anything in the paper or anything on our website that would put lives at risk. now, as a rule, when we do a story that's based on some kind of a repository of data we link to the data. so we owed our readers some explanation of why we hadn't do that in this case, and we didn't do it because we really had no such assurance about the risks posed by the raw material that ...

Bipartisan as part of it. shaping up to be a full-on shootout. today republicans taking aim -- ♪ -- >> -- at the democrats' plan. understandably. also blasting the treasury's ability to take over and dismantle giant companies at risk, as the latest example of government overreach, we can debate that, although it doesn't prevent too big to fail. republicans say it sends the wrong message to wall street and will just lead to more bailouts. take a listen. >> it will lead to endless taxpayer bailouts at wall street banks. that is clearly not the direction the american people would like for us to...