Page 17 - Doesnt Say News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Aid to a campaign from a foreign national or foreign government. if the president was asking for information on joe biden so that the doj could commence a criminal investigation, that would be acceptable. if the president was asking for information on joe biden so that the trump campaign could use it against him thinking he is likely to be the democratic nominee, that would be a violation of federal law. >> martha: how do you know it's not the former? >> we don't, we don't. that's the task of the house judiciary committee if they want to bring articles of impeachment and they have to interpret...

>> jesse: it's not about the president. it's about the truth, juan. >> juan: if i was to get to the most powerful part of this allegation it would be that the president was extorberting a foreign government for i think it was $250 million in defense aid in exchange for going are a a political opponent joe biden. >> except the latest report we have doesn't say that the quid pro quo part of this equation is one of the most important parts of this story. and the "wall street journal" story tonight says that according to their finding there was to quid pro quo. that the president asked, they said ...

Stop now. >> jesse: it's not about the president. it's about the truth, juan. >> juan: if i was to get to the most powerful part of this allegation it would be that the president was extorberting a foreign government for i think it was $250 million in defense aid in exchange for going are a a political opponent joe biden. >> except the latest report we have doesn't say that the quid pro quo part of this equation is one of the most important parts of this story. and the "wall street journal" story tonight says that according to their finding there was to quid pro quo. that the president asked, ...

No one has challenged the basic accuracy of the story that they published, or of what is in the book. it's true that a material fact was left out, and the "times" read then editor's note explaining about, which is what you do when you leave something out. but it was no conspiracy to leave out that fact. it was unfortunately cut from the piece, as i understand it. >> harris: when you say that no one has challenged, how can you challenge if the alleged victim and the one witness they talk about who actually didn't witness anything -- he did talk to senators and the fbi about what he thinks he sa...

White house is saying that even with corey lewandowski who didn't work in the white house at all, who has never been a government employee, the white house is nevertheless asserting tonight that they have advised mr. lewandowski to limit his testimony. and not talk about his conversations with the president. right? it is unclear on what authority the white house might be trying to limit lewandowski's testimony, again, he doesn't work for the white house, doesn't work for the government, never has in any capacity. they should have no authority as to what he does and doesn't say. particularly, w...