Page 3 - Doesnt Stand Up News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Republicans,in democrats, let's get the facts without the partisanship. >> sean: professor, if i had emails, if i did what hillary clinton did, that is obstruction, a crime, slam-dunk case. >> she obviously disputes that. in her book, she says they were personal emails that she was entitled to erase. they were not subpoenaed. she should be investigated, i don't ever dispute that. >> sean: she admitted they ffnever went through all of the emails individually. that doesn't stand up. >> she also says -- >> sean: quid pro quo? >> first of all, nothing happened, none of this happened. i agree with ...

Happening to john brennan and might dial back what they're saying in order to not risk offending the president. nobody wants to offend the president, but when you're no longer in gho longer in government, you have a right to give your opinion. if it's an opinion which doesn't stand up, let the white house respond to that from the lectern at the briefing room but not by taking away their clearances. >> are you concerned beyond an attempt to stifle free speech that this is also about undermining the credibility of the russia investigation? you heard the president just there again make that charg...

Interesting statement and the fact that the speaker of the house doesn't stand up in between that trolling, doesn't try to make it stop, is also interesting and, again, congressman, you quit, you retired from congress right now. do you feel that republican there is and the speaker of the house have abdicated a certain responsibility? >> john, we're in a period not so much of separation of powers but of parties and probably the greatest regret i have that and that my republican colleagues will have after the november election is that we didn't reassert our article one powers. when the president...

Part of the memo to the democrats which also lays out a lot of other detail about how carter page was on the fbi's radar. they had, in fact, interviewed carter page in march of 2016, several months before they made this application in october of 2016. so the notion that this article was another key piece of intelligence that the court was relying on doesn't stand up. >> page, do you believe that -- i mean, the rebuttal of the democrats say that the dossier was impleed with narrow use here. do you believe that this warranty would have been approved without the doesy say based on what we know? >...

Investigation was under way for months before the fbi sought a warrant for carter page. when they sought that warrant for carter page, carter page was no longer working for the trump campaign. and oh, by the way, that was in october of 2016 they sought the warrant. so the information they would have gotten back from that warrant, whatever intercepts, whatever information, would have arrived in fbi offices well after the campaign. so basically, if you just think about those three facts, which are indisputable facts, and in fact in the memo, you see that the argument that there's somehow some co...