Page 13 - Don Steele News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

In the mid-80's I worked at an LA oldies station with some of the best-known names in the biz

First of all, let me apologize for last Sunday’s column. It was not what I had originally intended to send in; today’s column should have run last week. Last Sunday

They had found no evidence to corroborate the allegations in the steele dossier. >> it's not that clean, folks. they knew and they ignored it. and they continued to surveil him. why? why did they doctor the ema i-e. the people continued getting warrants that wasn't legitimate had a biased thatic road. how this opened, i don't know i know mr. durham has a different view. i respect your view they may have been a lawful predicate, one of the people pushing this was peter strzok from day one. so, ladies and gentlemen, we have a task at hand here, to make sure this never happens again, to hold peop...

And he's marketing the dossier, which is a bunch of garbage to anybody and everybody. to me that's important. is that important to you? >> any evidence of bias is supposed to be disclosed to the court and to the department lawyers. >> okay. so, let's play this out. in january, 2017, when they figure out the primary subsource and they talk to the russian guy that provided steele all the information, what should the fbi have done at that moment? >> two things. reconsidered internally where things stood and most importantly told the lawyers at the justice department who they were asking to help t...

January of 2017. so it's not -- i might have to go back and look precisely. >> in president-elect bush he mentioned that steele can't verify. >> correct. >> so it's pretty clear to me that it got up. so the court should have been told there were not. >> correct. >> how did they describe this meeting to the court in the warrant application? >> so, in the second and third renewal of the last two application, they told the court they had interviewed steele subsource on whom steele relied in writing the reporting and that they found the primary subsource to be credible. they did not tell the court...