Page 15 - Draft Committee News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

I wouldnt want to complete those. I think i have said enough for the moment. Thanks. Respectfully i disagreeing with member pillpa with respect to burden of proof, with respect to chapter 2. The fact that the matter has been referred from the task force means that the task force has found a violation. Perhaps a willful one. And i think that the burden of proof should definitely rest with the resplendent in that case. As a matter of fact, i think that if you recall, when the task force refers were not looking for readjudication. Again, we have five new members and its possible that consensus wo...

Actually happened in 1999 in ammiano for mayor. I recall some of that, but try not to recall all of it this sec. You could have the same efforts that happened with run he had run, and progress for all, in the context of a writein campaign and im not sure under this definition it would get captured. That is why im hung up on qualification versus election. May i ask you a question about that . Sure. Its not clear to me why that is materially different from what we have . Well, again its not necessarily the election of a person. That is not necessarily the goal of the committee or the committee w...

Sunshine task force finding remains goes into effect. Becomes our finding, because we were split 22, i. E. , dont have a threeperson vote. Or as we discussed earlier, could we carried forward to a subsequent meeting. If the commissioners at the 22 say that was a complicated hardfought and sincere, this is one that we really ought to bring forward to the next meeting and allow the fifth commissioner the possibilities of doing this by a 32 vote, whichever way that commissioner should go. But i think we have those same options at the 4person meeting could yield a 31 or 40 result without finding u...

What provision are you looking at . Im looking at a 1, shall mean my person, group of persons or entity that either receives contributions of 1,000 or more or makes expenditures of 1,000 in order to publicly support the election . You mean take the word public out of 2 . The definition of support . I guess that would be redundant. I think there is some merit in thinking about taking the word public out of the definition of support. Because why would we allow people to take private spend money on private actions encouraging someone to run without reporting that . We dont want to be in the busin...

In public. Well, i do feel like the way this reads right now, that if i collected 1,000 from five friends, which i was told to use to try to convince somebody to run for Elective Office, and i spent that money by taking them out to entertaining them for an evening, that this would not be covered. That would not be covered about i this. I dont know if were intending to know about that kind of of activity nort. But i dont think were intending to cover that. In that situation you are not spending money to convince the voters. True. So i think leaving out the word public is okay. Okay. Any other c...