information from the article jeffrey palmer s house a big in the new york times. real estate developer out there was no desire to here in california. withhold important why did they go to those information from our readers. we have all of it in the book. during the editing process lengths? clearly had you folks in there was an oversight and hollywood threatening that they would be trying to get the names of people showing this key detail about the up at jeffrey palmer s house fact that the woman herself to try to black ball them has told friends she doesn t from hollywood, guys. remember it and has not wanted to talk about it got brian: there we go, ed henry cut. and it was an oversight. with the pocket square even at the border. good job, ed. we are a team at the new york times. we have processes in place. ed: all right. one of you hosts, which host i think actually the way is it? it happened was the editors i can t remember all the being concerned about naming hosts. brian: i
martha: the latest on this, the new york times reporter behind that evolving kavanaugh story now doing some cleanup, simply insisting that it was an oversight that the original report did not include the key detail that the alleged victim does not recall the incident and made that very clear and has said this, and has said that all along. during the editing process there was an oversight in this key detail about the fact that the woman herself has told friends she doesn t remember it and has not wanted to talk about it. got cut and it was an oversight and the times adjusted we are very sorry that it happened. martha: a former executive editor of the new york times was here today defending the story as well. why does it end up in the new york times ? why does this end of the new york times ? because it s important. this is the third example of sexual impropriety by brett kavanaugh and it confirms our story of deborah ramirez.
office. and then almost immediately the story fell apart. sunday night the newspaper was forced to make a devastating correction to the piece. in fact, the woman that kavanaugh supposedly attacked didn t remember anything about the event. and just like so many previous stories about brett kavanaugh, the whole thing turned out to be a crock. so last night kelly and pogevin on a show highly familiar with botched stories. the explanation don t blame us, blame our editors. what happened with that omission that the times later felt belonged in the piece? well, first of all, lawrence, there was zero intent to mislead anybody about the details of the incident. in your draft of the article, did it include those words that have since been added to the article? it did. it did. it did. so somewhere in the editing process those words were yeah, i think what happened actually was that, you know we her name and the times doesn t usually include the name of the
sandra: the place the blame squarely on the editors for omitting those very important facts. here is the authors explanation. there was no desire to withhold important information from our reeders. we have all of it in the book. it s an adaptation of the book that we had to edit. during the editing process there was an oversight and this key detail about fact the woman herself has told friends she doesn t remember it and doesn t want to talk about it got caught. it was oversight. the times adjusted it and we re sorry it happened. a sad day for journalism with the new york times. the news division didn t publish this. this is a separate part of the paper. we talk about the division between editorial and news. i think the new york times tried to make that delineation but it is a black eye for the paper. you still have those in
too busy trying to impeach the president. the president tweeted a beautiful opening statement by court and ask you, thank you, he was one of three witnesses subpoenaed to be there. the other two white house staff secretary rob porter and chief of staff rick dearborn did not appear at the request of the white house. this is the first in what may be many hearings as most democrats said this prove their case for impeachment. not like there is any other work to be done at this point. thank you. did you see this as well? the new york times reporters who revealed a new misconduct claim against brett kavanaugh are speaking out. the women grill on the view over why they left out key details from their book in the controversial peace. during the editing process there was oversight and the key detail about the fact that the woman herself told friends she