Page 24 - Enemy Combatants News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

0 misleading the public but taking the court out of context. she repeated testimony from someone else and he says it is her quote. hawley praised her experience and said he looks forward to questioning her today. also important to note many questions about her time as a public defender and for her to get on the bench this time where she was now at the court of appeals three republicans, murcowski, collins and graham all voted in favor. we'll see what they do this time. >> trace: david spunt live at the justice department. >> dana: two fox news contributors. andy mccarthy and constitutional law...

0 world at large, and i think it's six months, maybe a year, but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if these a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states rp they are continued to be confined. that's the way the system works. are you okay with that? >> as a policy matter, senator? i'm not speaking to my views, that's -- my understanding is that the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people >> does that make sense to you as a way to deal with these detainees? >> i'm not in ...

0 whether or not they still present a threat to the united states or the world at large and i think it's six months, maybe a year. but that goes on at least on an annual basis, and if there is a determination that this person still represents a threat to the united states, they are continued to be confined. that's the way the system works. are you okay with that? >> as a policy matter, senator, i'm not speaking to my views. my understanding is the periodic review system is an executive branch determination of whether or not they are going to continue to hold people. >> does that make sense to ...

Charge the general with that. article 88, article 134 a second. laura: what covers talking to our adversaries and telling them ahead of time of battle plan that could exist? namely we would give them heads up? anything off the top of your head? >> let's assume they are an identifiable enemy, declared enemy combatants, there are provisions that cover that behavior. but we are not there. it is not unusual for one military authority to contact another military authority in an area of operation for purposes of planning but that doesn't seem to be the case we have here but it is chargeable if true.

Self-aware of the role his own actions played in creating those divisions in the last 20 years until the election of donald trump which had nothing to do with the war in iraq. bush signed on to this idea from other places that september 11th and the january 6th capitol riots, the capitol riot was just as bad as september 11th. it is really taking hold in some areas of the left to view the rioters as enemy combatants or insurrectionist and here they got their most prominent endorsement.