Ever had. Were a 247365 business, but its enjoyable. We take care of pets, dog boarding, and we have a retail store, and we make a difference in this community for our clients. When covid hit San Francisco, we had a couple of long conversations with the City Attorney, and we were deemed an essential Service Prior to essential workers in San Francisco. We have even repurposed, during covid, some of our space to support rescue dogs clerk hi, caller. This item is meant to be for the proposed continuance of the item, not the item itself. So i should return when after this is continued . Clerk correct. So while basically the time to talk about the project itself would be if the commission continues it to december 3. I see. Okay. I apologize. Clerk no worries. Chan, well take the next caller. I dont see any other callers. Clerk great. Commissioners, i just received word that the liberty street discretionary review, site 13, 2020007450drp02, at 428 liberty street, is proposed for continuance.
Their comments in advance to the Planning Commission, not sfgovtv. Org. The number for the public call in number should be displayed below on the hearing. In the covid19 emergency, please visit the Planning Commission website for our regular update. At this time, we will take roll. [roll call] clerk commissioners, the first item up on your agenda is consideration for continuance. The first item up on your agenda is item number 1, 2012. 0640 ofa2. The second item up for continuance on your agenda is 2019013981 cua, 224228 clara street, proposed for continuance to december 10, 2020, item 3, 2016012135 cua, 2214 cayuga avenue and 3101 alemany boulevard, proposed for continuance to december 10, and item 4, 2017013728 crv, 1021 valencia street, proposed for continuance to january 14, 2021. Those are the four items i have proposed for continuance. [inaudible]. Clerk i will take Public Comment on items proposed for continuance. Operator [inaudible] press star, three to unmute. Clerk well wait
Typically say yes. Now the answer is yes. Now whats the question . You cant do any better than that. And supervisor safai who has become a friend and colleague over these years, working on this project, and every month i know that im going to get a call from him saying, whats going on. What can we do . Oh, we have this technical problem. Lets figure out a way to solve it. Oh, we have to lobby the state to get funding, what can i do to help. Hes really helped, along with our partners at mission housing, in bringing the community into this so that this is not just about bricks and mortar. This is about holistic housing, you know, and youve heard all of the components of that in working with the community. I would also like to thank our staff and silver berg and nick wilder here today for all of the Technical Work needed to work with our partners at bart to make this technically feasible. This is a very challenging site. We have to deal with barts legitimate questions. We have to deal wit
Encourages the public to submit their comments in advance to the Planning Commission, not sfgovtv. Org. The number for the public call in number should be displayed below on the hearing. In the covid19 emergency, please visit the Planning Commission website for our regular update. At this time, we will take roll. [roll call] clerk commissioners, the first item up on your agenda is consideration for continuance. The first item up on your agenda is item number 1, 2012. 0640 ofa2. The second item up for continuance on your agenda is 2019013981 cua, 224228 clara street, proposed for continuance to december 10, 2020, item 3, 2016012135 cua, 2214 cayuga avenue and 3101 alemany boulevard, proposed for continuance to december 10, and item 4, 2017013728 crv, 1021 valencia street, proposed for continuance to january 14, 2021. Those are the four items i have proposed for continuance. [inaudible]. Clerk i will take Public Comment on items proposed for continuance. Operator [inaudible] press star,
The appropriate plantings there and encourage the project sponsor to eliminate the stair penthouse. Second. Commissioner fung . Commissioner moore . Mr. Lum, could you explain why the unit that is on the top, which now gets the roof deck, and i agree with the shaping of the roof deck and the possible elimination of the penthouse, why does it also need to have a deck the lower level . The main level . That is correct. It accentuates we had to do a setback for that because of the 30foot, 10 foot rule that says if you are doing in averaging of the rear, the building cannot be any taller than 30 feet. It has to be setback 10 feet to the 40foot height. The only other choice would be that would be a roof. It doesnt seem like a very nice thing for the living room to look upon. Or the walkable part of the roof would be smaller than bringing the deck all the way to the edge, because i do believe that the utilization of that roof, by a balcony all the way to the edge does not look much more mass