Epic Statute News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Be there may be elephants here, but they are not just in the covered jurisdictions. impeerically, we can show the elephants are more likely in the covered jurisdictions than uncovered. addition nally, the statute itself gives a bailout prediction that allows them that have a clean nose to opt out. >> and the bail in. >> it goes both waits, right. >> if a jurisdiction isn't covered, it can get put in. we update, basically, the data base and look at the law every few years. it sunsets. not just 98 to 0 in the senate and overwhelmingly the house signed by republican presidents an epic statute ado...

Unfortunately, in 2004, arizona passed a law that added its own requirements requiring proof of citizenship in addition and above to those from the federal form. they thought that wasn't enough. they wanted more. and we, of course, objected on behalf of our clients because this placed a special burden on people in arizona versus the burdens placed on people in other states. it's unlawful, unconstitutional and contrary to the intent of a statute and federal law should preimpt a state law. they knew it when they passed it. this should not be a hard case. >> let me pop to the panel. i want to ask...

It's clearly section five because it doesn't require -- second two prohibits discrimination but requires somebody to bring a case. section five puts on ownous on the discriminator themselves. >> there's no other statute wu apply this standard. we don't say because people are aware of gender discrimination. the law certainly has made it better. there has been progress. we have admitted it. the court admitted it. everyone's admitted there's progress. there's still a need. it's what congress focused on in 2006. it's incorrect to pretend we are revolting from 1965. congress looked at what has been...