Live Breaking News & Updates on Executive Privilege Doesn T
Stay updated with breaking news from Executive privilege doesn t. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
threats against lawmakers, all as the insurrection was about to begin. there s no escape, pelosi, schumer, nadler. we re coming for you. we re coming in like white on rice for pelosi, nadler, schumer, even you, aoc. we re coming to take you out. we ll pull you out by your hairs. how about that, pelosi? might as well make yourself another appointment. when i get done with you, you re going to need a shine up on top of that bald head. and that s not just another trump fan recording their own crimes or what would later be trespassing, the january 6 probe is linking him to a controversial capitol tour led by an incumbent republican congressman on insurrection eve. this is the surveillance video from that day. it is now evidence in the probe to how planned this attack was and if there was help on the insi the same man threatening to, quote, take out lawmakers with that eerie confidence about how far his plans might go appears to be inside the capitol doing what looks lik ....
Self-evident the judge in this particular case found that the committee was valid. he basically held that the committee was properly constituted, that they had the right to subpoena bannon, and that it was done properly with a vote of the full house. essentially the judge said what the committee did was absolutely legally correct. secondly, the idea there was any kind of privilege the judge blew that out of the water, too. bannon tried to claim he was told by one of trump s lawyers that he didn t have to testify and he shouldn t testify. but there was no real privilege here. bannon was not a government employee. he was not covered by executive privilege. executive privilege doesn t cover an insurrection or any kind of criminal activity. his defense is a big zero goose egg. there s nothing to it. and the idea that he s going to try and take members of congress ....
That can make a story, you know, really people passionate about it. one of them is emotion and partisan politics, and this story has both of those things. because, obviously, january 6th has been widelien condemned by widely condemned by most people who aren t super fringe right. but because it was so awful, i think it creates a lot of passion in the democratic party and people are, obviously, really going to be following a story like this. howard: i think what paused a lot of journalists is he had been cooperating, and he wrote a book and then suddenly citing executive privilege and now risking prosecution. executive privilege doesn t extend to mark meadows. we all know that, and donald trump is no longer president. that aside, howie, you said it. we can t even go beyond. he defied a subpoena. i have a jury summons on my desk ....
Seniors. what we are going to come out of this with, if we get all of these things, which are the progressive caucus priorities is really transformative. so that s what i was saying is i didn t want to settle for nothing, for, you know, the infrastructure bill and nothing on this build back better act. the priorities you ve laid out, strength, paid leave, home care, making bold investments in affordable housing, affordable drug price, roadmap to citizenship, what seems like it s getting thrown to the side, the clean energy performance program, which is pretty important in dealing with climate change. joe manchin doesn t want that. kirsten sinema doesn t want medicaid to be able to negotiate prescription drug prices. free community college is now out. are the compromises going to wind up being so much and so many that we wind up doing not ....
Legitimacy of this claim based on steve bannon no longer working in the white house, which is the reason why executive privilege doesn t apply to him. but any way, we ll go ahead and let them talk. here they are. steve bannon was a private citizen before, after, and during january 6. so why is the select committee interested in steve bannon? it s simple. he is a democratic party boogieman. this is what the majority has decided to spend its time on, holding a private citizen who wasn t even part of the administration at the time in contempt for refusing to comply with house democrats subpoenas? do you think that they ve made the argument that the white house has made that he has nothing to do with the white house so he doesn t get executive privilege. but what do you make of their argument? joy, what we tell them on the ....