Stay updated with breaking news from Fc maine. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Of trump s argument that the maine secretary of state, we just heard her, was politically biased against him? i think that s probably the least-effective argument he ll make in the courts of this proceeding. the court is unlikely to take that into great consideration. the maine secretary of state serves i think at the discretion of the governor. she was appointed in her position. most folks in those positions have political affiliations. i don t think any of those indicators undermine her decision. but it s the questions of process, the questions of what is the sort of due process that he was entitled to in this according to what s happened in maine, and was that standard met? that s the more substantive and potential more effective argument. marcus quhild recess, in his appeal trump s attorneys write this. section 3 of the 14th amendment to the constitution does not apply to president trump. he has never served as an officer of the united states and has never taken an oath to s ....
Court reviewing the matter. and i will uphold whatever the court instructs me to do, because the constitution and the rule of law are what matter. do you think the u.s. supreme court, madam secretary, needs to take this question up in order to clear up any ambiguity? we would very much welcome guidance from the u.s. supreme court. chris christie, as you know, he s a fierce trump critic, warns this move risks turning trump into a martyr. how do you respond to that? and do you have any concern taking trump off the ballot risks tearing the country apart? my duty under maine election law and the constitution and the oath i swore to the constitution is to look exclusively at the hearing and the evidence before me and make a decision based on the law. neither political considerations nor personal considerations for my safety could enter into that decision. i had a duty and obligation to follow the constitution, as do all of us who serve in ....
Authority, making multiple errors of law and acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner. her decision was based on section 3 of the 14th amendment of the u.s. constitution, which bars insurrectionists from holding public office. but this section of the constitution has now been litigated by multiple states across the country with varying outcomes. maine and colorado have opted to remove trump from the ballot under the section, but other states actually have been reluctant to really get into the merits here, instead relying on procedural arguments and opting to keep him on the ballot. wolf that also leaves the door open to continue to litigate this issue in the general election unless the supreme court steps in, and we still expect that former president trump will eventually appeal that colorado decision to the supreme court. so paula, how could this unfold when trump takes this to the u.s. supreme court? reporter: the big question is, when is he going to take it to the supreme co ....
Challenge this. i think one of the big questions that goes across the maine case, as well as the colorado case, is the record that is established by these states in determining that the former president was engaged in insurrection. one of the things that the maine secretary of state pointed out in her finding was that the record made that factual finding. but there was no actual proceeding in maine. it was just based on her assessment of the facts as are in really the public record. different than the colorado case, where there was a trial. it was short, it was limited, but there was some sort of judicial proceeding. i think in some ways, one of the issues the supreme court may need to look at when these cases all eventually get up there is what factual record under section 3 of the 14th amendment of the constitution is required to determine that someone who might be determined ineligible under that provision actually engaged in insurrection. good point. andrew mccabe, what do you ma ....
Challenging the to remove him from the primary pal lot in maine based on the 14th amendment s insurrectionist ban. we ll speak live with maine s secretary of state, shen that bellows, in just a few moments. first are cnn s chief legal affairs correspondent, paula reid. what is trump s team arguing, and what happens next? reporter: now it s up to the main maine courts. the trump team is asking the court to overturn the decision by maine s secretary of state of c maine, shenthat bellows. she opted to remove trump from the ballot. if you don t like what the secretary of state says about your ballot eligibility, you can appeal that to the court system, which is what they ve done here, asking them to overturn her decision. trump s team arguing, the secretary was a biased decisionmaker who should have recused herself and had no local ....