Page 9 - File Record News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

What kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even entail. Because the breadth of this privilege appears so broad that it is hard to imagine what would not be covered in light of yours and the City Attorneys of San Franciscos description. Sure. And maybe, internal communications about we are going to meet to discuss this at such and such a time. I dont know if who is assigned to the investigation, if that necessarily would be confidential, or how many people ar...

I dont know if that will be disclog be too much. I certainly would think that the Controllers Office would want to explain why it is. Or should not be disclosed. Any other thoughts from the commissioners on this . In a theoretical file, not the one at issue, are matters such as the timing of meetings, or strictly procedural matters included in the correspondence files of an investigate oral matter. Generally strictly procedural, and for example, when you talk about a meeting time, that is embedded within the procedure process, for instance if i am going to meet with a complaintant and you docu...

Protected confidential. I am trying to understand what kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even entail. Because the breadth of this privilege appears so broad that it is hard to imagine what would not be covered in light of yours and the City Attorneys of San Franciscos description. Sure. And maybe, internal communications about we are going to meet to discuss this at such and such a time. I dont know if who is assigned to the investigation, if that necess...

If the correspondence revealed that, you would not disclose that. Absolutely. And there may be other information too. I mean we are speaking abstractly, so i. You know i am doing the best that i can. I think that yes, absolutely, the identity of anyone that the Controllers Office was adjudicating, like inaudible during the course of the investigation inaudible protected confidential. I am trying to understand what kind of information could be in the file that if we asked the Controllers Office and the Ethics Commission to rereview for potentially nonprivileged documents what those could even e...

Time regarding files in general. But for this particular case you. We have spent a lot of time on the files. I mean, in light that have representation, it is unclear to me what benefits is going to be derived from having her redo what has already been apparently closely done and there is no mechanism that we can provide to ensure any greater accuracy. Not like there is an encamera review procedure or anything. I am not sure what benefit is derived for her to going back and revaoe view the documents. Are you saying that all of the notes, all of the documents in the file for this particular matt...