Stay updated with breaking news from Fist statement. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
for now, the city remains in ukrainian hands — but the battle may be just beginning. 0rla guerin, bbc news, kyiv. let's bring in ursula von der leyen, the president of the european commission, who is making a statement about the situation in ukraine. fist statement about the situation in ukraine. �* ukraine. at the same time, the entire world — ukraine. at the same time, the entire world is _ ukraine. at the same time, the entire world is witnessing - ukraine. at the same time, the entire world is witnessing the l entire world is witnessing the determined and brave resistance by the ukrainian army and population. as russian forces unleash their assault on kyiv and other ukrainian cities, we are resolved to continue imposing massive costs on russia. cost that will further isolate russia from the international financial system and our economies. in coordination with president biden, president macron and chancellor scholz, as well as prime
a trickly phrase man slaughter statute at all. that jury instruction seems pretty simple. >> absolutely not. it's very simple. i do want to clarify. mr. bates didn't inadvertently pulled his resolver. he carried a .357 resolver from his patrol vehicle, which is unmarked. he had a bright yellow taser on his chest and he has a pistol in his right hand. according to mr. bates' fist statement, and his initial statement, he had a pepper ball gun in his left hand that he used his right hand to power the valve up with. i'm curious how that happened. if mr. bates inadvertently grabbed his pistol from his truck, not pulled it out right when this event is taking place, but literally carried it from his truck how that's not culpable. he walks up to the man with a .357 that he's not certified to use and i doubt any deputy whether they're reserve,
pretty simple. >> absolutely not. it's very simple. i do want to clarify. mr. bates didn't inadvertently pulled his resolver. he carried a .357 resolver from his patrol vehicle, which is unmarked. he had a bright yellow taser on his chest and he has a pistol in his right hand. according to mr. bates' fist statement, and his initial statement, he had a pepper ball gun in his left hand, that he used his right hand to power the valve up with. i'm curious how that happened. if mr. bates inadvertently grabbed his pistol from his truck, not pulled it out right when this event is taking place, but literally carried it from his truck how that's not culpable. he walks up to the man with a .357 that he's not certified to use and i doubt any deputy, whether they're reserve, advanced, special deputies are ever certified to use a stub