Stay updated with breaking news from Flat affect. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Murder. he implicated his friend, 19-year-old vincent holmes, as the man who killed kevin rice. vincent holmes was a street kid, late teens. he was friends with william buck, hung out at the auburn manor apartment complex. really had a flat affect, borderline functioning intellectually. just a street kid with really no purpose in life. not surprisingly, when holmes was questioned, he pointed the finger at william buck. this created a problem. could forensics prove who pulled the trigger? several residents at the auburn manor apartments saw william buck and vincent holmes together on the night of the murder. they were outside the apartment drinking. the residents were able to identify the clothes each man was wearing. and with a search warrant, that clothing was retrieved from their respective apartments and ....
The man who killed kevin rice. vincent holmes was a street kid, late teens. he was friends with william buck, hung out at the auburn manor apartment complex. really had a flat affect, borderline functioning intellectually. just a street kid with really no purpose in life. not surprisingly, when holmes was questioned, he pointed the finger at william buck. this created a problem. could forensics prove who pulled the trigger? several residents at the auburn manor apartments saw william buck and vincent holmes together on the night of the murder. they were outside the apartment drinking. the residents were able to identify the clothes each man was wearing. and with a search warrant, that clothing was retrieved from their respective apartments and ....
you re not going to go speak with them? i don t have anything to say. now, aside from the thoughts of maybe he was building a legal case or legal defense, listen he was just involved in an altercation, listen how calm he seems talking in the middle of all this. does that say anything to you, jeff? absolutely. here we re looking at a person who is in such a state earlier, allegedly breaking things, threatening another individual. now all of a sudden he s so calm. we call that flat affect. it s inappropriate for the situation he s in. part of that is because he s manipulating the situation. the other part of it is he s just not connecting with the world in a socially appropriate way. everything happens from inside for him. within his mind. that s the reality. and he does not accept the ....
He had a flat affect, blah, blah, blah. so i mean, those kinds of things to me are sensational. they aren t really evidence. i think the devastating thing for the defense they really have to kind of handle and somehow mute is the fact that the daughters are there in court thinking that their father is a murderer. that is if you re the defense lawyer, to me that is the single worst fact i have to deal with. because that s the perception that those jurors are going to have. those jurors are going to be very swayed by that even if they are not supposed to be. someone s over here being animated. i never agree with these guys, right? i never agree with mark geragos and i never agree with danny. but i agree with them this time. and i think it s perhaps because i m married to a doctor. and the science doesn t make sense. if my husband wants to take me out he could do it in a surreptitious way. why would he do it this way. ....
He had a flat affect, blah, blah, blah. so i mean, those kinds of things to me are sensational. they aren t really evidence. i think the devastating thing for the defense they really have to kind of handle and somehow mute is the fact that the daughters are there in court thinking that their father is a murderer. that is if you re the defense lawyer, to me that is the single worst fact i have to deal with. because that s the perception that those jurors are going to have. those jurors are going to be very swayed by that even if they are not supposed to be. someone s over here being animated. i never agree with these guys, right? i never agree with mark geragos and i never agree with danny. but i agree with them this time. and i think it s perhaps because i m married to a doctor. and the science doesn t make sense. if my husband wants to take me out he could do it in a surreptitious way. why would he do it this way. ....