Stay updated with breaking news from Hearing mr. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
he was involved in communications with congressional members and state legislatures in the swing states where they were sort of pushing this idea that the legislature could come in and reverse the results in various states, and ultimately also pushing the fraudulent elector schemes, where the electors for trump when i hadn't met, voted, and sent their electoral ballots into vice president pence. he was part and parcel of all those things, but he was also write their hearing mr. trump, you know, every day, could really, i think, add a lot of important details to what we've already piece together from emails and texts and testimony that's come out in front of the house select committee. he could really, you know, flush out all the details, and be an extremely powerful witness against mr. trump, assuming that he appears credible. and you know, anytime there's a
marshal and host a podcast tudor dixon and douglas murray. oversight chairman james comer is calling them his a-team. we know the identity of one of the whistleblowers that gary shapley, the other thus far has been identified as whistleblower x. his identity, though, will be publicly revealed next hour and for the first time. at the hearing mr. x has been we learned with the irs for 13 years and he describes himself as a whistleblower compelled to disclose the truth. irs agent's attorney is vouching for the credibility of the two men coming forward. >> these are extremely credible investigators. gary is the supervisor of unit of 12 elite agents that investigate tax crimes.
cost trump the 2024 -- the 2020 election, despite the fact that it isn't true. and what you heard, that snippet that you played, there's much more to that answer. it was 4.5 minutes long. he used word like you heard with all due respect, he patiently and meticulously walked through and defended why he felt he was doing his constitutional duty. and when he finished with his answer, that small room applauded. and so we caught up with the woman who asked the question and asked what her reaction was. what do you think after hearing mr. pence's answer? >> i believe he's a good man. i love the fact that he is -- he is strengthened by his faith. but i really do feel like he altered history. >> reporter: would you consider supporting mr. pence after listening to him today? >> i would consider it.
the judge in the split second after the shot is fired, you can see in the body camera footage bagley's hands are up. cross-examination the investigator acknowledged the view from the body camera is obstructed by the way the officer's turned in the moment the shot is fired. >> officers are always faced on a day-to-day basis with dangerous situations like that and at times where they have to make split-second decisions where they're in a potential life-threatening situation. the mere fact that an argument is being made by the investigator in court that he was unarmed does not necessarily mean he's not a threat to the officer. >> reporter: victor, obviously a tough video to watch and we talked to family members just after they got a chance to watch that video and obviously it's the audio, those last moments of hearing mr. bagley take his last breath that stand out to that entire family. the lawyer was also telling us, though, they are thanking lsp
driven up gasas prices and food prices all over the world. ukraine and russia. that one the two largest wheat producers in the world. we're number three, the shut down we saw that yesterday's inflation data well, people don't knowwat p that 70 percentf the increase in inflation is the consequence of putin's price hike because ofhi the impact on oil prices 70% we need we need to address these high prices and urgently for working folks out there. ? >> yeah, what what where does he get that ? where he's getting it, where that number comesit from, but it's just not true . so here now with more of people who do know what's going on is professor of business and economics at the king's college in manhattan, fox newsin contributor bryan bredberg and power the future founder and executive director daniel turner and independent women's voice senior policy analyst gary sheffield. we here we've been hearing mr. n
polarizing personality. some love him some don't. >> reporter: but australia's government returning serve in a new filing today, saying they never told the tennis star that his so-called medical exemption would be accepted and denying that a positive covid test counts as the kind of acute major medical illness needed for an exemption. >> well, i think at the hearing mr. djokovic will ultimately be unsuccessful because of the very wide paths with the minister. >> reporter: djokovic expected to attend the hearing virtually from the hotel he has been cooped up in since thursday but tonight there are also questions as to why djokovic appeared unmasked at a tennis event in belgrade on december 17th the day after his lawyers say he tested positive it is not clear if djokovic knew his diagnosis. his representatives did not respond to our request for comment. in the balance, the star's hope of a record-breaking 21st grand slam title
kennard that the election was stolen is being repeated daily on major news outlets and from the corners of power in state and federal government not to mention in the near daily if you will minutations of the former president. members of parliament in the uk got quite a show on wednesday as prime minister boris johnson's former top aide for into what he calls the government's, quote, disastrous handling of the coronavirus. once an influential member of johnson's inner circle bluntly detailed the prime minister's supposed negligence, he specifically describes hearing mr. johnson say he'd rather see, quote, bodies piled high than impose another lockdown. listen to this. >> did you hear him say let the bodies pile high in their thousands or it's only killing 80 year olds? >> there's been a few different versions of this, of these stories knocking around.
our committee held its first hearing literally the day after schiff publicly released his report. in the first minutes of the hearing mr. sensenbrenner furnished the chairman with our demand for a minority day of hearings and set a deadline of december 6th for the president and republicans to present additional witnesses. it wasn't until saturday, the day after the deadline, the chairman transmitted 8,000 pages of material to the judiciary committee, and we still haven't gotten anything, not that it matters to the majority. you can still go ahead and vote for yes tomorrow and vote for yes today and do that. but it should matter for this institution that while i was in georgia, i received a call from my staff saying they just released 8,000 documents on thumb drives, some of which were going to be kept in a secure holding and when i asked the chairman about these documents, he said, we're not going to read them either, we're not going to have a chance to go through them, we're just going to go ahead with what we're doing. that was from my chairman who i
president is going to want sort of as many people as possible not just defending him but people d like alan dershowitz w have done so publicly, who have done so on television and have made a forceful case not just on the legal merits but in the court of public opinion which in some way is where the president and his team is being fought. that's where they fought the mueller fight was being fought. they were correct in that, and they want someone who is fiery, and i thinkme that's why you're hearing mr. dershowitz's name floated now. >> among the defenses mounted tonight that you heard from the republicans, do you hear anything that is convertible to their argument that they'reve going to have to post in the senate and corollary anything, if youte assigned yourself the floor manager for defending trump, how would you go? >> well, we didn't hear any
they were correct inin that, an they want someone who is fiery, and i think that's why you're hearing mr. dershowitz's name floated right now. >> mieke eoyang, among the defenses mounted a tonight that you heardns from the republican do you hear anything that is convertible to their argument that they're going to have to post in the senate and corollarily, if you assigned yourself the floor manager for defending trump, how would you go? >> well, we didn't hear any substantive defenses of the president, and what the republicans werepr arguing this evening, what they were basically arguing was that the process has been unfair. the whole point of a fair process is to allow both sides to present their case, but we have not heard a substantive defense of what the president has done other than he did it, get over it. so theyt really have very litt that they can argue here. i actually think that defending