FPC Brief Argues Banning Non-Violent Criminals From Firearms is Unconstitutional
Under the history and tradition of the Second Amendment, non-violent felons should not lose their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Stay updated with breaking news from Historical Justification. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Under the history and tradition of the Second Amendment, non-violent felons should not lose their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
The Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of an important brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of Bryan Range v. Att’y General of the U.S.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: In early January 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“the DOJ”) Antitrust Division (“the Division”) announced a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”) with Argos USA LLC (“Argos” or “the Company”). 1 While DPAs have been used to resolve prosecutions in other Divisions of the DOJ, the Antitrust Division has considered DPAs only since a policy shift in 2019. Under the new policy, DPAs were to be applied in limited situations where a company committed an antitrust crime despite having an effective compliance p...