Page 16 - House Process News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Haven't seen enough evidence to make a decision. that's one of the reasons i've proposed subpoenas for these witnesses and documents all directly relevant from officials who have yet to testify under oath during any stage of the house process. senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence. again, let me say that. to every senator in this room, democrat and republican, senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence, and they're going to have to explain that position to a public that is underst...

Enough evidence to make a decision. that's one of the reasons i propose subpoenas for these witnesses and documents all directly relevant from officials who have yet to testify under oath during any stage of the house process. senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence. again, let me say that. to every senator in this room, democrat and republican, senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence. and they are going to have to explain that position to a public that is understandably skeptica...

Some republican senators have said that, while the charges are serious, they haven't seen enough evidence to make a decision. that's one of the reasons i propose subpoenas for these witnesses for these documents, all directly relevant, from officials who have yesterday to testify during any stage of the house process. senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence. again, let me say that to every senator in this room, democratic and republican. senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence, a...

Decision. that's one of the reasons i propose subpoenas for these witnesses and documents, all directly relevant, from officials who have yet to testify under oath during any stage of the house process. senators who oppose this plan will have to explain why less evidence is better than more evidence. >> that's where we start today with some of our favorite reporters and friends. former senior fbi official chuck rosenberg, msnbc legal analyst who worked at the southern district of new york, maya wiley. phil rucker and msnbc correspondent garrett haake on capitol hill. phil rucker, garrett haake...

And showcased their bias. like at the point about the timing of remarks and if someone says something it doesn't. it looks a little too cozy like a foregone conclusion, which it might very well be. >> they have to be careful about that. like i said to come out this process has been a sham, unfair, i think for the process and the house of representatives. on the one hand, i understand the senators saying that i don't want to give any credence to the house process at the house impeachment, because it's just baloney. but on the other hand, i would like the american public to see the other side of...