McDonald's lose Big Jack court case against Hungry Jacks
But McDonald’s won a related misleading or deceptive conduct claim after Hungry Jack’s boasted the Big Jack contained “25 per cent more Aussie beef”.
Stay updated with breaking news from Hungry Jack. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
But McDonald’s won a related misleading or deceptive conduct claim after Hungry Jack’s boasted the Big Jack contained “25 per cent more Aussie beef”.
After a three-year court battle, the Federal Court of Australia found that Hungry Jack's Big Jack burger had not infringed on McDonald's Australia's Big Mac trademark.
Court rules Hungry Jack’s had not infringed on trademark, but had misled consumers over ‘25% more Aussie beef’ claim
McDonald's has lost its bun fight with Hungry Jack's after it failed to convince a court the 'Big Jack' burger infringed on its 'Big Mac' trademark.
Hungry Jack’s has had a big legal win over McDonald’s with a court ruling its “Big Jack” burger did not infringe on its rival’s trademark.