Live Breaking News & Updates on Indra Sawhney Judgment

Stay updated with breaking news from Indra sawhney judgment. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Supreme Court to pronounce judgment on Maratha reservation on May 5 | India News


Mumbai: A five-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court will on Wednesday morning pronounce its judgment that will decide the fate of Maratha reservation in Maharashtra.
The bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, Nageswara Rao, S Abdul Nazeer, Hemant Gupta and S Ravindra Bhat dealt with six main issues that it had framed on March 8, chief among it being whether the state legislature is competent to identify ‘Socially and Economically Backward classes (SEBC) given the Constitution 102nd amendment confers the power on the Parliament. The question is whether the 102nd amendment deprives the state legislature of its power to determine the SEBC and grant quota? ....

Nageswara Rao , Ashok Bhushan , Indra Sawhney , S Abdul Nazeer , Hemant Gupta , Supreme Court , Maharashtra State Backward Commission , Justices Ashok Bhushan , Economically Backward , Maharashtra State Backward Commission Report , Indra Sawhney Judgment , Justices Bushan , நாகேஸ்வர ராவ் , அசோக் பூஷன் , இந்திரன் சவ்னேய் , கள் அப்துல் நஜீர் , ஹேமண்ட் குப்தா , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் , மகாராஷ்டிரா நிலை பின்தங்கிய தரகு , நீதிபதிகள் அசோக் பூஷன் , பொருளாதார ரீதியாக பின்தங்கிய , மகாராஷ்டிரா நிலை பின்தங்கிய தரகு அறிக்கை , இந்திரன் சவ்னேய் தீர்ப்பு ,

Supreme Court Verdict On 50 Percent Reservations and Maratha Community


Supreme Court And The 50% Limit On Reservations
Published by GulteDesk
March 15, 2021
The Supreme Court, while considering the validity of the reservation for the Maratha community in Maharashtra recently, decided that it will hear all the States on the 50 percent limit on total reservation imposed by the court in the Indra Sawhney case (1992).
The rationale for imposing 50 per cent rule is based on the relationship between affirmative action in the form of protective discrimination and the equality provisions of Indian Constitution. Vinay Sitapati in the section on reservation in The Oxford Handbook of The Indian Constitution (edited by Sujit Choudhary et al, 2016) terms this as one of balance between competing Constitutional principles of formal equality, social justice and efficiency. ....

Tamil Nadu , Vinay Sitapati , Indra Sawhney , Sujit Choudhary , Anirudh Prasad , Supreme Court , Articles The Parliament , Oxford Handbook , Indian Constitution , Constitutional Law , Universal Book Traders , Reservation Policy , South Asia Books , Indra Sawhney Case , Ninth Schedule , Scheduled Castes , Scheduled Tribes , Backward Classes , Indra Sawhney Judgment , Constituent Assembly , தமிழ் நாடு , வினய் சித்தபதி , இந்திரன் சவ்னேய் , சுஜித் சவுத்ரி , அனிருத் பிரசாத் , உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் ,