Page 4 - Intelligence Document News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Russia. we used this document to justify spying on a presidential candidate in the final weeks of an election. what i learned is back in the beginning of his relationship with the justice department, he produced an intelligence document predicting that vladimir pruden was losing his grip on power, on his way out the door. that has proven to not be very good intelligence, has? it's two years later in vladimir putin is fully entrenched in power. there is a lot of questions about where he got his sources and that is going to be a big issue as to what congressman just said, we used this dossier an...

Gavel in this committee, not really looking into the details that could perhaps give you a different impression of what happen happened. he's not raising major concerns at the start of the investigation. he has some more questions he wants to ask that person who drafted any intelligence document he read but which nunez did not get. >> these arnlt. certainly with respect to this investigation. he released certain documents, also the one on the trump dossier. he chose not to read them. staff read them, gowdy red them, others read them, but he chose

Contractor of fusion g.p.s. with funds supplied by the hillary clinton campaign and the dnc. the dossier was a form of opposition research designed to be used against trump in the presidential campaign. it was not an intelligence document. it was oppo. the dossier claims that russian authorities didn't simply collude with trump during the 2016 election, the charge you hear a lot about. it also claims that russian intelligence cultivated donald trump as a kind of asset, a kind of one-man sleeper cell for more than five years. there is no evidence of that. the dossier also claims the kremlin fed...

Democrats did not want this to happen. they had their own memo. how did democrats do that? >> i think, first, let's remember, this is not an intelligence document. this was the a document crafted by devin nunes, his staff. this was a person who was so partisan that he was removed from leading the investigation. it's purported to be a summary of documents that he's never even read. it's like asking someone who's never read a book to do a book report. on the other hand, adam schiff, the ranking member of the intelligence committee read the underlying documents, has detailed the omissions and the...

He was so partis an he was removed from leading it. it is it's sum reap of classify the documents. >> tucker: how many partisans are in congress? >> in is not an intelligence document. it is prepared by a partisan. and he recued himself. and he purports to summarize the documents he never read. >> tucker: i department ask you about nubez or the documents. bullpen the information that is available to all americans. ment obama administration made the case that the man was a spy. i can't comment. >> tucker: i know that. >> i have read both memos. >> tucker: you don't need to have read the memo to...