Live Breaking News & Updates on Intent

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Intent on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Intent and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

that jury room to deliberate, they have heard multiple times the narrative and the facts that support, or prosecutors are going to say is the intent necessary to unlawfully influence the 2016 election. that's the brass ring here. the business records are important, but the brass ring on the felony conviction is that intent. but there's the other thing which is the likability and believability of the prosecutors themselves. the rapport -- when you've got regular folks sitting in that box, sitting there not as lawyers, not as experts, not as folks with an axe to grind, part of what they're assessing is how much do i trust this lawyer? how much do i believe they have integrity? that's why prosecutors will also in their opening statements say, i'm going to tell you about the witnesses. i'm going to tell you about the weaknesses in their own case.

Prosecutors , Election , Facts , Times , Narrative , Jury-room , Support , 2016 , Thing , Intent , Business-records , Brass-ring

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

they're getting deep at the underpinnings of the second crime. remember, this is 34 originally misdemeanor counts of false kaigs case of business records, bumped up to a felony because the prosecution needs to prove not only did donald trump sign those checks or do the falsification with, one, an intent to defraud, but two a separate intent to, in this case it's conceal, a previous crime which is, we're calling it election interference. it's really campaign finance law violation. the prosecution has sought to elevate their language surrounding how they are describing this case. it's going to be the defense's job to pick that apart and break it down. the defense in one of those motions in limine made an argument not to use the phrase catch and kill. they didn't win. they thought it was too prejudicial. oftentimes i think it's misleading when we talk about a scheme to suppress negative information, a catch-and-kill

Prosecution , Donald-trump , Beyond-a-reasonable-doubt , Crime , Business-records , Counts , Felony , Underpinnings , Kaigs , 34 , One , Intent

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

make this conspiracy, this agreement a reality, as long as he has the intent for what it was supposed to do for him. >> how much can ignorance safe save you? >> right, he's got to remember he still has to contend with the transcript of the audio tape. that's one of the things that defense attorneys are going to also have to deal with is all these things that prosecution and laying out for 45 minutes and 30 seconds, you know, is this point of, look, you have to look at this all together to understand what happened here, whereas the defense is saying let's piecemeal it. let's say this is just paper. let's say, you know, but donald trump didn't create these invoices, was just told to sign them. this is exactly what happens in trials all the time. it's totally legitimate. it's as effective as, you know, you can imagine defense attorneys being. it's what it's supposed to be. it's the jury that's going to say what do i think of that audio tape transcript, what do i think about this timing? what do i think about these two

One , Things , Conspiracy , Intent , Transcript , Audio-tape , Safe , Act , Ignorance , Agreement-a-reality , Prosecution , Defense-attorneys

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

checks he made to michael cohen in 2017, he had full knowledge of what he was paying michael cohen for. >> maya, the importance for the prosecution of bringing the jurors back to that 2016, what was happenings and why that's so important. >> so, so important because they have to show intent, right? that's the agreement to conceal with the intent to unlawfully interfere in the election. that's their case, and it was october 7th, 2016 that access hollywood comes out. the very next day, donald trump, cohen, michael cohen and hope hicks are on a call together. i mean, the proximity to that and what we know that michael cohen's going to say about being directed and what he was directed to do from the beginning, that's why all of these things and then october 26th, this is the donald trump

Prosecution , Michael-cohen , Maya , Jurors , Knowledge , Importance , Happenings , 2016 , 2017 , Election , Case , Agreement

Morning Joe

previously said they would support trump now say they would back rfk jr., compared to just 7% of former biden voters who say the same. >> you never know how this is going to break. in 1980, john anderson ran. >> you kind of get the thinking. >> they're conspiracy theorists. >> exactly. >> john anderson ran as a republican against ronald reagan. >> yeah. >> jimmy carter, he ended up taking votes away from jimmy carter. >> right. >> when his intent was to take votes away from ronald reagan. again, in this case -- >> so interesting. >> -- we're seeing the same thing happen. >> president joe biden's odds of winning re-election are the highest as they have been in at least three months. on the website predictit, it costs 54 cents to bet on a biden victory and 45 cents to bet on a trump victory. the more likely outcome is the more it costs to bet on. biden's odds have been steadily increasing over the past month after trump's odds reached a

Trump , Voters , Same , Robert-f-kennedy-jr , 7 , Ronald-reagan , Republican , Votes , Jimmy-carter , Thinking , John-anderson , Intent

CNN This Morning

intends to testify. >> i think it's way too early for criminal defendant to make that decision, and i am a criminal defense attorney at this point, so i see it from both sides. now, if donald trump chooses to testify, it's because the underlying elements of this case require the prosecution to establish beyond a reasonable doubt what was the specific intent of donald trump himself? and so if he testifies he's effectively getting up there to say that it was not his intention to cook the books as it were, or to interfere with the election by not according certain payments to election officials. the prosecutors meanwhile, are going to have to build a case to show that donald trump has limited credibility that he's lied on several occasions depending on how you view that the prosecutors have no doubt for air that they prepared a long list of a specific specific instances of untruthfulness, and that's what ultimately will be the fight here if he testifies& bibi believed so what do expecting

Donald-trump , Decision , Case , Elements , Sides , Defendant , Defense-attorney , Point , Prosecution , Intent , Intention , Books

CNN This Morning

continue to function, so that there's not a hecklers veto that's happening where the loudest, it most radical voices have control over the discourse. but what we've seen is is that by going in and cracking down, it's just further inflamed the situation. it's becoming about more than just a pastime and when what's happened is protesters say that they're just criticizing israel. and i believe that in a lot of their minds that's their intent, but there's a whole vocabulary that they have for talking about what's happening on campus that veers almost directly into anti-semitism, were they accuse jewish donors, they accuse a jewish, jewish forces in the world for ordering the crackdown. it's not the university president acting on her own those are straight up anti-semitic tropes right there that you outline. yeah it's an even go further. it's not almost anti-semitism. it is antisemitism and this is

Situation , Control , Discourse , Hecklers , Function , Veto , Voices , Lot , Protesters , Israel , Minds , Pastime

Verified Live

clear this case is a bad - in the last half an hour? it 3 clear this case is a bad donald trump's intent, making hush money payments is not a crime. lying to your spouse, as wicked as it is, is not a federal crime or state crime in the us. but they are alleging donald trump made these payments to cover up news of his affairs to corrupt the 2016 presidential election in the us.— corrupt the 2016 presidential election in the us. that disabled claim. election in the us. that disabled claim- what _ election in the us. that disabled claim. what do _ election in the us. that disabled claim. what do you _ election in the us. that disabled claim. what do you make - election in the us. that disabled claim. what do you make of - election in the us. that disabled claim. what do you make of the | claim. what do you make of the framing, in one sense these details we are familiar with already, but we've heard in the build—up to hearing from these two sides, the prosecution and defence, they are so important in cases like this for framing, guiding thejury about important in cases like this for framing, guiding the jury about what will happen? do you go along with it is crucialfor will happen? do you go along with it is crucial for both sides that they clearly get their point across at this moment?— clearly get their point across at this moment? , ., ~ ., ,

Case , Donald-trump , It , Us , Half , Crime , State , Intent , Hush-money-payments , Spouse , 3 , Election

Trump on Trial New York v. Donald Trump

who say they had affairs with donald trump. we'll tell you what he said and what his testimony today might prove because remember, while a big part of the defense's job is to poke holes in d.a. alvin bragg's case, lawyers for the state actually have to back up every single thing they're putting before these jurors. so let's break this all down, and we're also going to look into what happens next. joining us now, nbc news correspondent vaughn hillyard. good to see you outside that courthouse, where you have been all day now. bring us up to speed on what happened today. >> reporter: it was a shortened day inside of this courtroom, namely because one juror had a dentist appointment, and passover led the courts to determine it was going to have an earlier afternoon. those four hours inside of the courtroom did not lack tension, and what you heard in opening statements from the prosecution was the intent to tell a story, beginning in august of 2015, two months after donald trump

Donald-trump , Case , Toy-da , Testimony , Job , Lawyers , Part , State , Affairs , Holes , D-a- , Alvin-bragg

Trump Hush Money Trial

video to go to donald trump's intent. they're going to argue the reason why he really wanted to silence stormy daniels is because the access hollywood video had just come out. we'd all seen it. his campaign was reeling and he was trying to recover the judge has sort of i think given a bit of 50, 50 ruling here, the judge has said, we're not going to play that tape that we've all seen many times for the jury. they're not going to see it. they're not going to hear donald trump say in grab them, et cetera but we will introduce evidence that donald trump and his team in knew about that tape and their reaction to it. so the jury will know that the statements were made, but they're not going to hear this sensational tape itself. >> and we know right now is judge merchan is reading his decision. >> trump is sitting back in his chair not reacting to the ruling. you see that right here on the left side of your screen. live feeds from reporters inside the courtroom. here, and what do you think? that ruling standing by the ruling. i'm not going to allow you to show the video, but you can provide a transcript and you can allude show evidence that alludes to it. >> so the judge is doing exactly what he's supposed to be doing, which is allowing admissible evidence or

Judge , Donald-j-trump , It , Ruling , Campaign , Stormy-daniels , Reason , Video , Access-hollywood , Intent , 50 , Statements