Stay updated with breaking news from Iwasnt standing. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
About russia today, mr speaker, i simply observed that the former leader is. sorry, i m so sorry! his leader. i understand the please he entered. they don t seem to cut much ice. i he entered. they don t seem to cut much ice. . , he entered. they don t seem to cut much ice. .,, , ., he entered. they don t seem to cut much ice. steve. j much ice. iwasn t standing. steve. laughter i strongly welcome the further set of sanctions. we look forward to further steps being taken in the days ahead and not being held back by perhaps some of the slower moving members of the alliance in europe. what does the prime minister agree that if sanctions are really to bite on putin and his gangster ....
I agree 100% but where was pence when the entire political class, not even the political class, republicans in congress were saying like, can this election be overturned? where was this then when he actually had a role in government? we re now six months. who cares what he says now. it doesn t make a difference, but where was it then when we were trying to ensure a peaceful transfer of power? anyway, i m just a little bit confused about that. jake sherman, i completely agree with you. like in the days after the insurrection, when our capitol was desecrated and people died and people were tortured with the american flag, where the heck was he? was that a paid speech? six months later? what a flop. i mean, what a weak well, honestly, he just wasn t standing by our country when he ....
What do you do? when did i say i was confident? i said what i said was let s get this straight. i said what will change the behavior is if the rest of the world reacts to them and it diminishes their standing in the world. i m not confident of anything. i m just stating the facts. how does that account for an constructive meeting? if you don t understand that you re in the wrong business. harris: wow, president biden snapped at a cnn reporter on the world stage after a summit with vladimir putin. too bad he wasn t standing next to putin to snap at him. he later apologized for losing his temper. president biden: i owe my last questioner an apology. i shouldn t have been such a wise guy with the last answer i gave. anyway, thanks for being here. harris: as jarring as that exchange was, some of caitlin colin s colleagues on the scene ....
White house special counsel emmitt flood, that the white house initially rejected the request, similar in the way they handled the john kelly the former chief of staff interview. this was a change from before. as you may recall, before, white house staffers were voluntarily being interviewed by robert mueller s staff. the white house wasn t standing in the way. in this case, there was a change. of course, there was concern about executive privilege and those conversations sarah sanders had with the president, whether they should be protected. we don t know if there were limitations. i can tell you in talking to sources, sarah sanders, before she would go up on the podium, she would talk to president trump. he was involved in what she said at that podium. then he would watch and they would talk about how she did at the podium. it would make sense that the investigators would want to interview her. the question is, were there guidelines, parameters, given the executive privilege concer ....
As you may recall, before white house staffers were voluntarily being interviewed by robert mueller s staff. the white house wasn t standing in the way. in this case, there was a change. of course, there was concern about executive privilege and those conversations sarah sanders had with the president, whether they should be protected. we don t know if there were limitations. i can tell you in talking to sources, sarah sanders, before she would go on the podium, she would talk to president trump. he was involved in what she said at that podium. then he would watch and they would talk about how she did at the podium. it would make sense that the investigators would want to interview her. the question is, were there guidelines, parameters given the executive privilege concerns? interesting, pamela brown, appreciate it. with me now is preet bharara. what do you make on the roger stone news? over and over he denied direct contact with wikileaks. ....