Page 3 - John Erlich News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

december 14. november is just a discussion to make sure we are on the same page. vice president vietor: i am sorry. i had a follow-up on prop. 26. how would that affect cca? >> it would not have a dramatic impact on cca, because the way we are envisioning it is it would simply pass through the cost and only the cost, and we would not have any kind of profit. when we said profit, if we charge somebody a pg&e rate, that is more than our cost. that is where the profit comes in. nobody pays more than if the use pg&e, but it would lower it to what our cost of generation is. to the extent ...

through field personnel. everyone was wonderful. the vast and complicated system i was requested to oversee in establishing some of the security protocols for homeland security were immense. i built what had been established and took it to the next level. john will be moving forward with the next level as well. i truly want to thank you. the sfpuc should be very proud of its employees -- what dedication i have seen through all levels. very dedicated. everyone bent over backwards to exist me whenever -- to assist me whenever i made requests. i am always at the service of the sfpuc, wh...

>> the commissioners have received electronically copies of all the communications sent to us since the last regular meeting. if you have any issues or points you would like to raise or ed regarding the advanced calendar, if you could also note those. the commissioners have also received the two indicated staff reports. >> i have some questions. first of all, i want to thank you for putting on the budget hearings well in advance. we usually wait until the last moment and scramble around. i do want some clarification. not the budget hearing, but under january 20, that is a thursday. b...

for water and wastewater. the most immediate impact would be that -- for example, right now we provide power to the airport tenants. the airport tenants pay us lower than they would pay pg&e, but pay us more than it costs us to generate the power. we use those extra proceeds to finance other programs. prop. 26 would say it cannot -- you cannot charge more than it costs you to generate your power. it would not allow government agencies to generate any income to be used for other projects. it would be a major impact on general fund to the city, all of the programs we have been doing us...