Stay updated with breaking news from Judicial analyst. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Which should bring some sort of action. let s get right to our senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napolitano. judge, correct me if i m wrong on any of those matters. and is it a violation, or is that you want for interpretation? you re not wrong, shep. and it was, as usual, an excellent summary, not only of what we just heard from secretary kerry, but of the history of this region. look, the violations of the law, local and international law, are profound and except for the words from president putin, essentially undisputed. to introduce military force into another country without then consent or invitation of the other country is a violation of a half dozen treaties. guess what, russia sits on the security council and will veto anything. that remdy is not going to happen. russia has already violated the laws of world in the geneva convention, shep, by having ....
President obama flip flopping, changing his tune on the nsa spying program. do his new proposals that he made on friday actually offer protection to americans privacy? let s talk to senior judicial analyst, judge pan drew napolitano. good morning. the president s new proposals do not change the fundamental principle that the government on a massive scale is violating the fundamental right to privacy that every american has and the specifically guaranteed right to privacy in the constitution. the constitution doesn t say all spying is illegal. it says spying on all of us is illegal. sure. so if the government wants to spy on a conversation you and i are having, it goes to a judge and explains to the judge why, in that conversation, it will probably learn of some criminal ....
In terms of picking a fair juror this would be something that would be discussed with each individual juror. have you heard about this case? tell us what you heard about the case. i heard there was a notebook that was released, says x, y, z. that juror is automatically thrown off. judges don t like when people disobey their orders. if this judge finds out hypothetically someone on prostitution team or prosecution team or law enforcement intentionally disobeyed their orders there could be rulings that help the defendant. that is what the defense attorneys are supposed to do, hold the government to their burden. make sure the government plays by the rules. gregg: arthur aidala. good to see you. always great being on with you, sir. gregg: thank you. we re staying on top of the story for you. if you want to learn more about jana winter s case go to foxnews.com. by the way i would invite you to read a couple of opinion pieces there. one by our senior judicial analyst, judge andrew napol ....
Who reports to attorney general holder who knew of the f.b.i. investigation in late summer and sat on it based on fox reporting there was no notification of the chair and ranking member of the house of representatives and senate intelligence that the director was the subject of an f.b.i. investigation. we received no advance notice. it was like a lightning bolt. i found out when i came to washington on thursday night, friday morning the director said there were a number of calls from press about this. reporter: that is key is that the notification issue, senator feinstein said, will be part of the investigation into benghazi. it is not just the security fails that led to benghazi but the failure to notify the relative haven t parties on capitol hill of both republicans and democrats. shepard: thank you from washington. with us now is the senior judicial analyst, who now also ....
Apparently are staying very busy with all this going on. judge andrew napolitano is here. fox news senior fox news judicial analyst. judge, any of those things we just mentioned raise a red flag you think could present a big issue this election time? well all they can present a big issue, jenna. people could argue in new york and new jersey where the outcome for the presidential election is probably not in dispute. we didn t get a chance to vote. 25% of us didn t get a chance to vote. so give us a chance to vote on wednesday. state is without authority to do that, in the presidential election. they can let people vote on wednesday for other candidates but federal law requires all voting for president be concluded before midnight local time everywhere in the united states. so . jenna: period, underscore that? correct. the governors and legislatures of the various states can not change that. on the other hand we had the incident that you addressed in the introduction to this segment ....