Stay updated with breaking news from Judicial Processes. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
![Kerala High Court Monthly Digest: March 2024 [Citations: 146-210] - Vimarsana News](https://vimarsana.com/images/vimarsana-bigimage.jpg)
Nominal Index [Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Ker) 146 – 210]Ahammedkutty Bran v Sukumaran 2024 LiveLaw (Ker) 146 B. v State of Kerala 2024 LiveLaw (Ker) 147 Manuja Mythri v Advocate T K Ajan 2024 LiveLaw...
Exclusive for Subscribers from Monday to Friday: Why National Green Tribunal and Deep tech are relevant to the UPSC Exam? What significance do topics like Election Commissioners appointment, E V Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh case and retail inflation have for both the preliminary and main exams? You can learn more by reading the Indian Express UPSC Key for February 8, 2024.
The government opposes the recommendation to extend the retirement age of judges based on their performance, stating that it may lead to undue favoritism and erode the powers of Parliament. They argue that linking performance evaluation to retirement age may not be practical and will not yield desired results. The government also expresses concerns about judges being susceptible to pressures and the burden it would create on the judiciary and executive. The parliamentary panel acknowledges the government's response and decides not to pursue the recommendation.
Extending the retirement age of Supreme Court and High Court judges based on their performance may not be practical, will "further erode" Parliament's powers and may result in "undue favouritism", the government has told a parliamentary panel.
An extension in retirement age of judges will ensure those with greater experience and appropriate calibre stick around longer and help reduce the huge number of cases pending before the higher judiciary