Page 2 - Know Burisma News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Them recover certain memories. maybe they were trying to protect themselves or protect the president. hill today said it's just not credible that sondland and others could have not put it together that when the president and others around him were saying burisma they meant an investigation of joe biden. but ultimately you have two weeks of testimony, 12 witnesses, and everything points in the same direction. and yet if you watch that hearing and listen to adam schiff at the end of it, the frustration he was expressing, it's understandable because he had heard the republicans on that committee ...

>> let me go to mimi on this question. if you were a judge on a bench trial would you believe sondland when he is said i didn't know burisma were the bidens after all those months? would you believe him? >> absolutely not. first of all, and i think the point ms. hill was trying to make today was it belies common sense. i know i keep using that word, and i know it's not the world we're in, but she was trying to drive that home today, too. you know, first of all you have rudy giuliani out there publicly saying that he's going after biden. i mean, there was this whole dust up and in fact he calle...

The 2016 election dnc server and burisma. it became more and more difficult to secure the white house meeting because more conditions were being placed on the white house meeting. mr. giuliani conveyed the notion that president trump wanted these announcements to happen. i believe that the resumption of u.s. aid would likely not occur until ukraine took some kind of action on the public statement that we had been discussing. >> it was made abundantly clear if they hadn't put two and two together themselves, if they wanted that aid they were going to make these statements, correct? >> correct. ...

Whistle-blower's report, telling the president's defenders exactly what they did not want to hear. they called him apparently expecting him to say what he said in his closed-door testimony, that he saw no evidence of a quid pro quo, or let's call it for what it is again, a shakedown. well, now he says he was wrong. he was out of the loop. he didn't know burisma meant biden. >> since i gave my testimony on october 3rd, a great deal of additional information and perspectives have come to light. i've learned many things that i did not know at the time of the events in question. >> so now he knows...

Meeting short. is he going to talk to us about that tomorrow? what is he going to say? his name keeping coming up with witness after witness and we get all those accounts, and his account wasn't that quite complete or in some cases was contradictory. he's really in an interesting position because he doesn't want to lie, but he's got stuff he didn't say before. i think he's going to tell a much more complete story. i'm taking that cue from the fact that he already amended and extended his testimony once, and i think he's going to prove to be one of the most damning witnesses in this inquiry. >>...