Page 2 - Lewsinsky Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Has two components. freedom of religion and freedom of expression. this was primarily a freedom of expression case. what the baker said is, my cakes are works of art. they express a view. and by forcing know bakeme to be for something i disagree with you're vile violating my freedom of expression. so there, arguments about is a cake expression. all the weddings i've been to a cake never says anything and the couple never got into discussing how this cake would look. as soon as they said what they wanted it for the baker said, sorry, i can't do that. so that's a question here. are flowers expre...

Address same-sex marriage can be categorically used to compel speech in the case of a baker or somebody in some other quasi artistic community or artistic community who is forced to make something for a same-sex couple. >> and that's the question i had r you here, what does this is a now about those and the tie discrimination laws more broadly? does it seem like there may have to be another perhaps more definitive ruling from the supreme court down the road to sell that once and for all? >> that may be' case. remember back in the same supreme court case that established a right to same-sex mar...

Human rights law be forcing him to express a view he didn't agree with. he argued that his cake baking as was was a matter of free expression. >> i want to bring in danny. danny, pete talked about is, one and done. what kind of broader national implications from any, does this decision have? >> this decision isn't a surprise. the they arged that it might be leaning towards the baker in this case. in a way, this is a narrow decision in the sense that the baker is not compelled to speak, he's not compelled to create a cake. it was clear that the couple could have bought any of the premade cakes,...