Stay updated with breaking news from Liability Co. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
/PRNewswire/ -- The hybrid operating room market is driven by factors such as the increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical procedures. The market is...
/PRNewswire/ -- The hybrid operating room market is driven by factors such as the increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical procedures. The market is...
Two insurers may not have to pay nearly $300,000 spent defending two Illinois state's attorneys in the "Englewood Four" malicious prosecution case, but the question of whether they must pay their share of a $30 million settlement remains, a federal judge held Monday.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. (California Insurance Code Section 5335(b) Bars Defense of Insured for Action Brought by the Attorney General's Office for Violation of California's Unfair Competition Law and False advertising Law) (July 2021) - In Adir International, LLC v. Starr Indem. and Liability Co., 994 F.3d 1032 (April 15, 2021) ("AG lawsuit"), the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of a declaratory relief action filed by Adir International, LLC ("Adir") against Starr Inde...
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The Ninth Circuit ruled on Thursday that a California retailer must pay its own legal fees in a state consumer protection lawsuit brought against it by the California Attorney General, despite its insurer’s agreement to cover defense fees for false advertising or unfair competition claims in the insured’s policy. The retailer was also forced to pay its insurer Two Million Dollars as reimbursement for fees already expended by the insurer as the case was pending. The three-judge panel in Adir International, LLC v. Starr Indemni...