Latest Breaking News On - Lin larson - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

well, your honor, we think we prevail under either test but we think this case is closer to larson because in larson, what you had was a facially neutral law. it didn t not mention religious domination by name but it did focus on religious groups and the result of it was to distinguish between them in a way that favored some and not others. and that s exactly what we have here. we have an order that on its face doesn t mention any denomination, but that is we have alleged and there s strong evidence already to support is intended to favor some religious groups over others and that is that is exactly the situation in larson. now i know the other side is saying if it doesn t mention a particular denomination on the face of the document, that isn t what larson said. in larson, the law did not mention a denomination. again, we also think we prevail under the lemon test which is explained in some detail in our district court briefing. we do not unfortunately have space to describe tha

Weyour honorDinn caseIt didn tFacially neutral lawDoesn tLemon testDistrict court briefingLin larsonIsnt what larson